If 2020 was a Trump- and Covid-inspired year of social media excess, 2021 can’t help but see some reversion. But it’s more than that, with big Internet companies coming under greater regulatory scrutiny worldwide, especially Facebook and Google. This year is going to be a tough one for Mark Zuckerberg, especially. And while I don’t expect Zuckerberg to abandon his CEO job this year, he eventually will, simply because it isn’t as much fun as it used to be and there will come a point (maybe in 2022) when leaving the top job will help Facebook’s stock.
At this moment there’s reportedly a bot operating on Telegram selling for $20 or less the personal info including phone numbers of 500 million individual Facebook users. What’s the logical corporate response to a gambit like that? Nobody knows because nobody has been in Facebook’s particular position before.
And in fact nobody knows a lot about managing companies as big as Facebook as the social network further invades our lives. Most managing, you see, is copying behaviors from a short list of role models and Zuckerberg no longer has any who have faced what he is facing today. He has outgrown his own psychological support system.
No Internet company embodies its founder more than Facebook does Mark Zuckerberg. I’ve written about this before, but he literally owns the joint, so anything that happens — good or bad — can’t really be blamed on anybody else.
Zuckerberg’s primary role models have been Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and Larry Page. Each modeled different ways to manage through dominance. Steve was a brilliant tyrant (“I know I’m an asshole,” he told me more than once); Bill tried to technically dominate by claiming to identify bad code from across a room (he really can’t); Larry taught by example to hide behind the algorithm, blaming it for, well, everything from nonexistent customer service to employee income inequality.
The only unique truly self-actualized character in this mentor group was Steve Jobs and Steve is dead. The others all got too rich and otherwise absorbed to stick with the corporate day-to-day and are gone. Maybe they are finally grown-up. And even they learned from others (again Steve being the exception). BillG was taught to run a company by IBM and Jon Shirley while Larry Page followed a path blazed by Jerry Yang and guided by Eric Schmidt.
But none of those guys faced what Zuckerberg faces today, calling all the shots and making all the hard calls by himself. That has to be exhausting.
Yes, Sheryl Sandberg is also COO at Facebook and yes, she is a marvel (I’m a huge Sandberg fan), but Zuckerberg is the boss.
I’m not calling for the demise of Facebook, which has a good grip still on its audience through more than just the core service, but the social media market is in transition and none of my kids have Facebook accounts, which I think is telling. I predicted this years ago, by the way. Even Facebook has a shelf life.
And so 2021 will see Facebook poked and prodded and taxed and regulated and possibly even torn apart. Google will be, too, but Facebook is frankly less essential and more vulnerable. How Zuckerberg responds will be where he blazes his own managerial trail. However it goes will take a toll, though, and even Zuck will eventually decide it’s better to become a philanthropist and find some new way to change the world. Though probably not until 2022.
Well, no. CEO will retire at some point shock horror. Wet behind the ears sociopath has other managers and advisors and consultants doing the heavy lifing while he okays it. There’s more to this vipers nest than Mr Plastic Face. Regulators although not US regulators know what to do although they are waking up to it after the EU set a lead. (Stop being so tiresomely US-centric!) Why are you a Sheryl Sandberg fan? She’s a nod along fluffer. Facebook and Google et al are already being poked and prodded. This only isn’t not a prediction it is not news. As for Mr Plastic face becoming a philanthropist? Only for cosmetic reasons to take peoples eye off that sweeeeeet charitable foundation exemption where he gets to hang on to the bulk of his fortune tax free.
.
Yes, Mark Stephens (aka Cringely), Jobs is dead and Gates retired and you are out of the industry so stop namechecking them like they are your best mates and putting your name in the same sentence as them. I’m sure they were and are pissed off about this. In fact Gates did say he was pissed off and Jobs just used you like a cheap condom so friends? I think not.
.
Gates taught to run a company by IBM? Where did you pull that one from? In fact let’s rewind. Mr Plastic Face is some kind of business genius who sprung from whole cloth whereas Gates is this apprentice of IBM? Honestly, do you know how STUPID you sound?
.
Yaddah yaddah “predicted it years ago” yaddad yaddah. Totally made up none story which was beaten to death a hundred times before your fingers hit the keyboard you claimed was lost in a fire.
.
On the plus side only onther five (or six) “predictions” before a statement on Mineserver “in 7-10 days from now” (Timestamp: 12th January 2021) so that deadline has already bust.
Finally in the last paragraph we find out what your agenda is.
You should really go fuck yourself.
No one is forcing you to read this blog and, quite frankly, Bob’s not obligated to post on any schedule but his own. This isn’t a subscription site and, near as I can tell, Bob makes no money from it.
If you “invested” in a crowdfunding campaign and things went pear-shaped, well, that’s the risk you take. It’s not a guarantee, it’s, by definition, speculation.
The failure rate of startups (over 10 years) is 90%. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/personal-finance/040915/how-many-startups-fail-and-why.asp
Crowdfunding campaigns are essentially startups without VC backing. You should absolutely go into them thinking you’re going to lose your money and be pleasantly surprised if things worth out.
Bob/Mark’s not perfect; he never claimed to be and neither are the rest of us.
Honestly, I just don’t understand why folks would invest the time and energy in “hate reading” this (or any other) blog. Don’t you have better things to do?
I can’t disagree with anything you said; it’s all true. But it’s clear you are somewhat new to this site, since there has been much discussion about why people are upset with Bob. I, for one, never lost anything to Mineserver simply because I was not interested it that game. If I were, there is no doubt that I would have contributed, with confidence, because of Bob’s credibility up to that time. Now we would all just like him to come clean, telling the truth about what happened, either here, or preferably, on the Kickstarter website.
Should I close down my MySpace account?
Actually, no. Statements and evidence given to a select committee are covered by parliamentary privilege and may not be used to prosecute or sue anyone. Also the last time I checked human rights may not be derogated and the Information Commissioner in law may not sign peoples rights in law away. Whoops!
.
I suspect there is much more to this story and it has security services fingerprints on it somewhere. Their excesses won’t come as a surprise after numerous court cases nor undercover cops shagging women protetestors and making them pregnant and running off to leave them with the baby.
.
imho whoever Facebooks lawyers are they should be up before professional standards regulators fighting to keep their jobs. Massive failure of due diligence and ethics.
.
https://techcrunch.com/2021/01/26/facebooks-secret-settlement-on-cambridge-analytica-gags-uk-data-watchdog/
Ignore these haters. I very much enjoy all your posts, and wish you’d post more often…
Bob,
You’re a great writer, but you’re wrong about this one, and here’s how I know: no one who has capital control the way Zuck does is going to give that up easily. He’s on the ultimate power trip and as a sociopath, he probably doesn’t even realize it.
FB is trying to reinvent itself to be more “friendly,” more relevant, kill Craigslist, etc. but at the end of the day, it’s not really a place for friends and it can’t really take the place of human interaction (for most human beings).
So, I don’t see this happening unless he gets forced out.
Yeah let’s all buy in to Mark Stephens (aka Cringely) stock at $0.15 and pump it until his stock splits five times at $374 a share.
.
Then again probably not.
.
I can’t even get gravatar to work on this stupid blog so everyone can see my wobblies.
Where is the prediction? The idiot can’t even write a prediction column and remember to include it. Is it Zuck will quit, but not this year? So your prediction is nothing will happen.
Jobs knew he was an a-hole. Does Robert X know he is a moron who can’t write?
It may not be much of a prediction, but Bob isn’t required to step out on a limb. “And so 2021 will see Facebook poked and prodded and taxed and regulated and possibly even torn apart. Google will be, too, but Facebook is frankly less essential and more vulnerable.”
Not deep enough. A true understanding of Cringe’s “method” needs to go further than this.
.
He roughly outlines, in this write-up, that
.
— Facebook will “hit its peak” in 2021
— Zuckerberg will “run out of role models”
— I, Cringely, gauge that all tech trends last ~10 yrs
— I, Cringely, have massaged past data to fit this
— I, Cringely, am thus forcing FB into this duration
— FB won’t die, but “social media is in transition”
— FB will be “poked and prodded and regulated”
— By the way, my Cringe-kids don’t have FB accts
— I often use my Cringe-kids as counterexamples
— But, in this case, I cite them as soc-media trend
— Let me name-drop a few celebs while I’m here
— Zuck will eventually decide to do non-CEO stuff
— He might not even quit in 2021, but he will in future
.
And, roughly 12-14 months from now(ish), Cringe will assess his own ‘prediction,’ above, by saying “Well, yeah, Zuckerberg’s actions don’t match any role models anymore, as I predicted,” or “Facebook entered a vague non-quantifiable transition, as I predicted,” or “Facebook was poked and prodded by at least one critic in high office, as I predicted,” or “Zuckerberg engaged in some side activity, hinting that he’s not so interested in being CEO anymore, as I predicted,” SO HE WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG AND HIS LIFETIME AVG IS 70% SO WHY DO ANY OF YOU EVER DOUBT HIM?
.
I knew an Internet prankster, once, who used to publish film critiques. His posts would include such masterful witticisms as “The betrayal and conflict elements were especially well done,” or “This film operates on two levels, the literal and the metaphorical, and, as such, some audiences won’t appreciate it.” The joke was he’d never actually seen the film(s) in question, and sometimes they weren’t even out yet. Said pundit had thousands of Netizens convinced that he’d somehow gotten an advance Revenge of the Sith screener, using vague allusions and double-speak, as noted above. I get that vibe from many of Cringe’s entries.
.
So call that MY ‘prediction’ concerning these ‘predictions.’ Could replace the guy with a 250-line NLP bot.
So . . . Bob/Mark should just give up and go back to writing horoscopes? Trust me, I’m a Leo!
Still trying to get this stupid gravatar thing to work.
https://en.gravatar.com
@Gene
.
Ooh that’s nice language. Eff-why-eye I have a dildo and vibrator for that.
@Ron
.
Yeah I have a gravatar Ron, Thanks. I just can’t get the stupid thing to work on here. Name and email does nothing so I’m sticking with what I use now. That works.
I set up my gravatar before WordPress got involved, so I don’t remember the details, but it seems to me that it didn’t show up anywhere right away. I think if it exists on Gravatar, it will eventually be discovered. Here’s another idea: https://wordpress.com/forums/topic/how-long-does-it-take-for-a-change-in-gravatar-to-take-effect/
An automatic filter for non-family-friendly Gravatars.
@Ronc
.
Thanks this is a consideration. Not that I’m expecting huge demand to see my tits nor are they anything special. I mean, they’re not Stormy Daniels proportions. Not even close. Poached eggs really. Blink and you’d miss them. In fact I’m surprised there are any left after my last client tried so hard to kiss and lick them off.
I better start running those cheap ads while I can. Anyone need a professional community, documentary, or industrial video for $550.00? I’m located on the Front Range.
Totally disconnected from reality. You could go paragraph by paragraph but here are just two:
.
“none of my kids have Facebook accounts, which I think is telling”
.
But they probably have Instagram and What’s App accounts, which are all piping into the same data pipe. That’s ok, these acquisitions and Zuckerberg’s strategy to capture younger demographics with alternate apps is only about 10 years old.
.
“Facebook is frankly less essential and more vulnerable”
.
Facebook is basically the directory of every town in America (and probably beyond, just sticking to what I know). There’s no competition there. Many businesses aren’t “grafted” onto Facebook, Facebook tunneled under them.
@granville
.
Mark Stephen (aka Cringely) boasting about his “savvy kids” following after their fathers footsteps. In reality surveys indicates Facebook is perceived by younger people as being for “old people”. Like you say what does Mark Stephens know about security? Has he asked his kids to explain their views or is he just being patriarchal and ignorant? Not only did Facebook pay the big money to kill the competition and buy up their business model which Facebook may not have been able to replicate but also fight off becoming irrelevent.
.
Moving on from Facebook’s “recommended friends” outing sex workers who have taken great care to seperate personal lives from sex work (yes Facebook really is that pervasive) from what I gather loads of American escorts are on OnlyFans. During a pandemic a lot of activity has gone online but this won’t last forever. OnlyFans really only benefits from sex work being largely unlawful in the US so they have a direct financial interest in the status quo. Not only does Europe have better privacy law but also for sex work by and large in Europe sex work is legal or it’s legal to advertise in various ways. For various reasons the biggest advertising providers for the sex trade moved their physical operations to Russia of all places. It’s not for legal reasons but to protect from political overreach by random politicians who get a bee in their bonnet over a headline in the media. Nobody wants to get stung like the US based Backpage. As for Paypal, Mastercard, and Visa they are guilty of exporting US law and very puritanical even when US law and politics stops at the border.
.
Eric Schmidt put his hooker on the company payroll. People keep forgetting this.
.
Most of these companies make up a bullshit industry. Nobody would miss them. There’s also a lot of milage in going old school. There ain’t no substitute.
“none of my kids have Facebook accounts”
But do they have Instagram accounts? Quite likely. Same thing. That’s why Zuck paid $1B for IG.
The smoke is starting to emerge from the ZuckBot, and signs of desperation are starting to manifest themselves in its attempts to promote FUD and deflect attention away from Facebook’s own chicanery.
We saw how Gates played that game, and it will be entertaining to see Zuck called to the stand when the anti-trust suits go to court, where he won’t be facing a panel of tech-ignorant legislators who need their grandkids’ help to open email (if they have email at all), but government trial lawyers.
Gates was also a ruthless Capitalist, but at least his company didn’t directly undermine the democratic process, and facilitate genocides. Profiting from the buying and selling of Facebook users’ data is the least of its transgressions.
Bored. We have another 4-5 of these dreary “predictions” to go?
“…anything that happens — good or bad — can’t really be blamed on anybody else…”
The Hell it can’t. Modern politics (and business is now a form of politics) is all about blame-shifting. The key enabling technology is the memory hole. And it doesn’t even depend upon Zuckerberg’s own imagination; Facebook is too big to fail, which means that when he needs to shift blame for something, all he has to do is sit back for a few minutes and wait for one of his symbiotes to pick the target.
There are signs of bad code that it’s perfectly possible to spot from the other side of a room.
Poor layout is a massive red flag.
[…] Zuckerberg.” [W]hile I don’t expect Zuckerberg to abandon his CEO job this year, he eventually will, simply because it isn’t as much fun as it used to be and there will come a point (maybe in 2022) when leaving the top job will help […]
[…] one for Mark Zuckerberg.”[W]hile I don’t expect Zuckerberg to abandon his CEO job this year, he eventually will, simply because it isn’t as much fun as it used to be and there will come a point (maybe in 2022) when leaving the top job will help […]
[…] التكنولوجيا في الصحيفة الأسبوعية إنفو ورلد (infoworld) في مدونته، إنه على الرغم من أنه لا يتوقع أن يتخلى زوكربيرغ عن […]
[…] التكنولوجيا في الصحيفة الأسبوعية إنفو ورلد (infoworld) في مدونته، إنه على الرغم من أنه لا يتوقع أن يتخلى زوكربيرغ عن […]
[…] التكنولوجيا في الصحيفة الأسبوعية إنفو ورلد (infoworld) في مدونته، إنه على الرغم من أنه لا يتوقع أن يتخلى زوكربيرغ عن […]
“Bill tried to technically dominate by claiming to identify bad code from across a room (he really can’t);”
I believe he can. And so can I, and so can you, and so can we. But it’s limited to a specific type of code and it’s really about the code structure, not necessarily whether the code is correct or not. As an example, it’s when programmers employ a hill-climbing strategy in coding a nesting of conditionals (if statements). You get code like:
if ( A ) { if ( B ) { if ( C ) { /* A, B and C are true */ } else { /* A and B are true. C is not true */ } } else { /* A is true. B is not true */ } } else { /* A is not true */ }
When this code is separated across multiple lines with indentation, you’ll see what looks like an expanding tree that eventually starts to collapse (when the ‘else’ keywords start to show up). The true actions are quite distant from the false (else) actions and, while the code may be correct, it becomes unmanageable and there are alternatives to writing more manageable code, and as such, this code would be considered to be bad code. In its multi-line form such code is very recognizable from across the room, and such code (often with way more nesting than this example code) actually occurs quite frequently.
I always thought the ‘gift’ of recognizing bad code at a glance was attributed to David Cutler (the VMS, WNT guy). David was (and probably still is?) a Microsoft employee so it looks like Bill just assigned this property to himself.
Vijay,
The problem is not with the code idiom. It is with the business requirements that the code idiom is a literal transcription of; which means that it is with the methods of requirements elicitation.
…which means that it is ultimately with the universal failure to understand that humans can work processes that cannot be coded, because their definitions are partly heuristic. In order to code human processes in legible and maintainable code, they must be rationalized and simplified, typically quite drastically.
I always taught my business analysts that as soon as they heard the word “unless”, they had already lost.
[…] 2021 Prediction #2: Peak Facebook as Zuck runs out of role models (cringely.com) […]
[…] in fantasiose ricostruzioni e, perché no, in paragoni piuttosto ingombranti. Come riportato nel blog personale dell’autore, Zuckerberg potrebbe lasciare il ruolo di amministratore delegato, nel tentativo […]
Zuckerberg never had role models. Like every businessman, he is busking as hard as he can.
Take a look at the about face (pun intended) at Facebook Reality Labs; there developer conference is all about privacy and safety. You could hear a pin drop as most everyone was wondering if they were at the right conference. Up next; FB required for all the kiddos (and adults) playing the latest VR game titles. REQUIRED. As alarming as that sounds; it turns out that accountability and a verified real identity are actually good things when it comes to social media and children.
And the latest news to drop: FB Reality Labs release a memo on how they plan to deal with privacy and it’s a no-brainer; a complete copy of Apple and then up a notch. All processing must make locally a priority and when reaching out to the cloud a thorough explanation and pro-active “opt in” consent must come from the user.
But will it stick? Time will tell. I can say their Horizon Beta is nothing like it’s competitors (VR Chat, etc.) that are abound with problems with privacy, harassment, liabilities, stalkers, and dreaded in-appropriate child predator behavior. This may very well be the model API all their games and developers for the entire platform will have to abide by.
I am not sure what happed to this blog Bob but – the comments on these post are more entertaining than your average “People of Walmart’ slideshow. Is it the scamdemic or just people growing more and more bitter over the $100 they invested years ago that did not work out?
Always entertaining to read your blog and dig through the sludge in the comments.
It’s better to find some new way to change the world.
*That* usually does not end up well at all …
Facebook play a major role to get trendy news of all over the world. https://www.alltypeofproducts.com/buy-facebook-event-attendees . After reading your blog, i got the actual number of Facebook users.
That’s how it works on mine by default using Titanium client https://jigsawpuzzle.io/