A few days ago I tweeted something and a reader reacted, saying about Cringely, “I thought he was dead!” Not dead yet, but I should probably explain my disappearance a few months ago from life in print. I’ve just been too busy working for a living. How does a 67-year-old hack with three minor children recover from going blind, losing his home and business in a horrible fire (like 2,000 others, we are still fighting with insurance companies), while appeasing an angry crowd of Kickstarter supporters armed with pitchforks and shovels? In my case, I went looking for venture money to recapitalize MineServer and I simultaneously started a satellite launch company to fund my eventual retirement.
I am not making this up.
MineServer found a VC in Beverly Hills, not Menlo Park. He’s that rare VC who wants to be a partner in the business. But this VC is also no fool, so he wants a co-investor to share the risk. I haven’t yet found that co-investor. Plenty of my old friends from the game sector have been willing to offer advice to MineServer, but nobody wants to write a check. So unless YOU want to step up, that means I will have to earn the matching money on my own, which is what I have been trying to do with my other startup, Eldorado Space.
Eldorado will later this year begin launching into low earth orbit CubeSats up to 12 kilograms in weight. Doing a space startup may seem like the stupidest, highest-risk way to go about restarting a career, but I thought it would be fun and it has been. Fortunately, we found a visionary billionaire to be our seed investor. We will shortly close our Series A round with most of that money already committed.
Space tech is exciting but it is also a Wild West, filled with crazy ideas and bullshit. We chose to stand out from the crowd by actually meeting our deadlines and inventing NOTHING.
Every space startup begins with an invention, you see, and inventions are risky. Space launch startups typically begin by inventing yet another liquid-fuel propulsion system, probably because the dilithium crystals were all taken. We already have plenty of liquid rocket engines, thank you. Inventing yet another liquid-fueled rocket in 2021 is an exercise in vanity.
So for Eldorado, we (which means my co-founder Tomas Svitek — a real rocket scientist who used to report directly to Jeff Bezos at Blue Origin — seven engineers and me) pledged to invent nothing and to avoid liquid fuels if possible. We took 50-year-old ammonium perchlorate composite propellant (the same solid fuel used in the Space Shuttle’s strap-on boosters) and improved it using modern materials, processes, and some common sense. NO 3D printing! The result is a cheaper rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours.
For example, the national security market is lately interested in rapid response launches, which to them means putting little satellites into precision orbits on 24-hour notice. That’s not so difficult, but few companies can then launch a second rocket 24 hours after the first. In contrast, we’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours after that until they tell us to stop. So if Bond villain Ernst Blofeld, for example, figured out a way to take down the GPS system, we could replace the whole constellation in less than a day, then do it all over again as often as needed. That would probably deter Dr. Evil from even trying his trick in the first place.
Key to this is a combination of solid rockets and air-launching. All we need is a runway, no launchpad.
But there are right ways and wrong ways to do air launching. Richard Branson’s Virgin Orbit drops its rocket horizontally from a Boeing 747 flying at 35,000 feet going Mach 0.7. We “toss” our rocket while flying in a 45-degree climb at 78,000 feet going Mach 2.2, which is much more exciting. You can see the curvature of the Earth.
Launching higher, faster, and at the proper angle lets us use a smaller cheaper rocket on a smaller cheaper aircraft for a lower launch price. Virgin charges $12 million per launch while we charge $1 million for up to 12U into any orbit.
The smallest rocket so far to put a satellite into orbit from a ground launch was the JAXA SS-520-5 that launched a 3 kg CubeSat for the Japanese government in 2018. That SS-520 used the same solid fuel as our Veloce 17 rocket which makes comparing the two very easy. Our rocket is shorter (4.15 meters compared to 9.65 meters), lighter (1050 kg compared to 2600 kg), and yet our payload is four times as large (12 kg compared to three kg). Our rocket is eight times more efficient than the SS-520 and the ONLY difference is air launching. With continued solid fuel development we confidently expect our 1050 kg rocket to eventually put 40 kg in orbit — 27 times more efficient than the $4.4 million SS-520-5.
As payloads get heavier, Reynolds numbers increase and there comes a point when ground-launching becomes superior, but for CubeSats (that’s all we do) air-launching is always better.
Yes, but…
There is always a but, isn’t there? In this case, the but usually comes down to “But how do you protect your business if you aren’t inventing anything? Where is your intellectual property? Where is your defensive moat?”
There’s actually plenty of clever IP inside Eldorado, but what mainly keeps another startup from just copying our work is the required fleet of Mach 2.2+ launch aircraft. We bought all of them, you see… all of them on the planet.
Great to hear from you again. Wishing you all the best in your business endeavours.
https://www.cringely.com/2020/01/23/not-dead-yet-what-bob-cringely-has-been-up-to/?replytocom=706090#respond
lol you can’t make this up
Great to hear this – best of luck!
But trying to get a small company financed these days is virtually impossible, I’ve been trying to find investors to take over my company so that I can retire and nobody is interested because we’re not making 2 to 4 million a year, even though we’ve been in business for thirty years and have people using our system for research and medicine worldwide.
I guess it’s because we’re not ripping the customers off, instead we support them. Bad move these days.
So, when I was a kid, I built model rockets. I was getting into liquid-fueled model rockets when I met my first serious girlfriend. No contest – first girlfriend beats model rockets for most teenage boys.
Anyway, I know the difference in solid versus liquid rocket engines to know that the issue with solid rocket engines is basically you light them and stand back – because you have absolutely almost no control after ignition.
With liquid rocket engines you can throttle up and down to a certain extent to control orbit entry – but, they are very complex compared to solid rocket engines.
I’ve wondered why NASA didn’t use an all solid-booster-engine instead of liquid plus strap-on solids.
Now you just have to work on your Bond Villain laugh. Always so happy to hear about your exploits, though I understand only about 10% of what you’re talking about. My dad and brother were pilots, so I’ve always had an interest in aviation and space. Keep providing the inspiration and insight, and good luck.
Clinton
A simple search on Google tells me you bought Boom Technology, An American startup company designing a Mach 2.2 (1,300 kn; 2,300 km/h) 55-passenger supersonic transport with a range of 4,500 nmi (8,300 km), to be introduced in 2023, called Overture. Smart
I wish you luck, really. I am concerned with yet another service putting more ‘stuff’ in orbit Besides the threat of it falling on my head it becomes risk to all the other stuff in orbit. What we need is something to start removing all the old/unneeded things up there.
Ahhh this reminds me of the Google Lunar X Prize ideas from a bunch of years ago. That never really went any where but was supposed to be an air launched if I recall. I’d still like to see a Cringely flag on the moon for “just because we can” reasons.
Welcome back Bob!
C’mon, Bob! Where’s the website?
Very excited for you Bob!
What is it that does not convince me about your story ? 1) what is your real, effective, substantial contribution to anything ? This is not a documentary showing people that made something. This is a nonsense made by nobody to go nowhere with … someone else’s money ? You are saying that you are doing something NASA did not ? Could not ? Are you a bright guy ? A desperado ? Who are you ? Why are you doing this ? Consult a shrink.
Good luck !
Any predictions for 2020 ?
You rounded up all the widow makers but someone is bound to try MiG-25’s.
[…] Rosa home in the Tubbs Fire in October, 2017, but he has apparently bounced back by co-founding a space launch company in San Louis Obispo, California, just up the road from where I went to high […]
“…while appeasing an angry crowd of Kickstarter supporters armed with pitchforks and shovels”
I was curious and looked up the Mineserver Kickstarter page. All I see are a lot of coments about not getting their money back, and no updates since 2016. How are you “appeasing” them?
Appeasing us? He isn’t even addressing us lol.. Update your Kickstarter page with literally anything..
Glad to see you pop up on my email Radar. Sounds like all is somewhat well. The insurance companies only goal in life is to make you miserable 😉 Exciting ideas and time to be working. As always, a tough crowd will chime in. Wishing you much success and prosperity! You could be dead…….
You may want to post this over on the Kickstarter page too. You know, the one that hasn’t had any updates since November 2016.
I didn’t think you were dead. I thought you were in jail for taking and publishing all those naked pictures of your children. You got reported to the police for that, why didn’t you go to jail?
(That’s not made up, he was actually taking naked pictures of his own children, and publishing them to this blog and other locations on the internet…)
Nice
Good to hear! On the “not inventing” thing … I have always personally felt that ideas are a dime a dozen, and what really matters is execution. Facebook was not a new idea, but they executed well, and won the market.
You weaken the proposition with that “replace a GPS constellation” example, since the current one orbits at about 20,000km. Even when the later 40kg-to-low-orbit plan works out at best you’d only be getting a few kg to GPS orbit, and that’s to replace an incumbent 3,900kg satellite.
Finally! One concern would be the accuracy of the orbit, since the solid can’t throttle. Are you using vanes or an additional liquid stage?
How about doing an interview on https://thespaceshow.com/ ?
I thought you were going to say your startup is putting a mineserver into orbit. 🙂
Cringely… so great to see an update! My thoughts and well wishes to you and your family.
By the way, I happened to see this update tucked away in my Junk Mail folder… I guess Google thought you were dead, too.
Cheers and best of luck!
Good to hear you’re still kickin’. Was just wondering about you the other day.
As always, an interesting read.
Good luck.
1. Blasting rockets off from Earth is never going to get us anywhere! We need a space elevator much sooner than later.
2. And we need a proper space station (with spokes, a few miles in diameter) where we can start manufacturing space ships and not have to haul them out of Earth’s gravity well.
Speaking of satellites, I just came across this interesting article in my RSS feed:
======
23 Jan 2020 | 19:00 GMT
Building an Orbiting Internet Just for Satellites
Kepler Communications’ CubeSat routers will keep other satellites in constant contact with the ground
https://spectrum.ieee.org/aerospace/satellites/building-an-orbiting-internet-just-for-satellites
Well, you can’t say that Bob isn’t entertaining, but… I’ll believe it when I see it.
What I don’t understand is what Bob is contributing to this company. It’s not money, because he doesn’t have any. It’s not technical expertise, because he isn’t an engineer. It’s not business experience, because he’s never run a successful business as far as I know. I can only conclude that he is the company’s chief bullshit artist (every startup needs one), because that’s where his expertise lies. 😛
Bill Thomas – totally unfair and out of context
So Bob, did you buy out Starfighters, Inc? See https://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/news/starfighters.html.
Go Bob! Always entertaining and thought provoking. And Mineserver grumpies provoking too. Good luck and hope it all works out. Keep us posted please.
WAit, you bought every Mach 2.2+ launch aircraft on the planet?
How many were there and whom did you buy them from?
Where is the fleet housed and from what airstrip?
I thought every Aérospatiale/BAC Concorde was destroyed completely. The Dallas Aerospace Museum tried to buy one and was dissuaded by both airlines and BAC & SUD Aviation …. unless you bought the old Soviet Tupolev Tu-144s … OMFG, you did, didn’t you! You must have paid pennies on the dollar, probably less. That fleet’s been grounded for twenty years. Hope you have a few mechanics and spare parts, unless you had disassembled half the fleet for that purpose.
Happy you’re still breathing and doing what you do.
Bob, best wishes on this new endeavor, but I don’t understand why you continue to disparage the Mineserver backers as “an angry crowd of Kickstarter supporters armed with pitchforks and shovels”, when you still refuse to post an update on the actual Kickstarter site. That’s all they want. That’s all they’ve ever wanted. Its a copy-paste exercise that would take you less than 10 minutes. If you’re not going to do it, you at least ought to post something on I Cringely as to why not.
maybe not all of them ;-))
http://www.canadianflight.org/content/lockheed-cf-104-starfighter
Are you working with Boom?
I assume you must be air launching over an ocean to deal with the sonic boom of a hyper-sonic aircraft?
BTW nice to hear from you, I was getting worried.
Wow. That’s badass. Wishing you luck, because this generation of commercialized space companies is super super cool.
“while appeasing an angry crowd of Kickstarter supporters armed with pitchforks and shovels?”
.
“Appeasing” is a verb. It indicates action, generally. I think the word you are looking for is “ignoring”.
.
Is there anything in Kickstarter’s Terms & Conditions that indicates if a creator admits on the projects page that there are big problems and it’s delayed indefinitely, that the creator is then legally obliged to give refunds?
Could this be why Bob seems to be refusing to update the supporters?
(I’m not a backer of the Mineserver so no skin in the game, just a fan of Bob’s who’s been watching this unfold for the past few years and finds the whole situation very bizarre.)
Found it! Cringely bought out some F104 Starfights. The venture is called “CubeCab.” http://cubecab.com/
Man I have missed your blog posts, welcome back! Sorry to hear about your troubles but you are fighter… and now into space (where I started my modest career). Super cool!
There may be some potential insight to be gleamed about the author from the link below:
Youtube => Plane Crazy Episode One => 5:40-7:20
https://youtu.be/9B6FLC1JiV0?t=340
For those who read ’em, context for Bill Thomas’ comment:
https://www.cringely.com/2009/12/15/fedex-kinkos-wont-print-our-christmas-card/
I have my opinion, as does Bill, as does Declan, now you can have an informed one
From https://www.kickstarter.com/trust:
“Some projects won’t go as planned. Even with a creator’s best efforts, a project may not work out the way everyone hopes. Kickstarter creators have a remarkable track record, but nothing’s guaranteed. Keep this in mind when you back a project.”
Kickstarter is not a store. Some backers don’t accept they are not buying a finished product, but investing in a venture.
@Ross The point is that even though Bob has mentioned the issues with the project on this page, he hasn’t bothered to update the Kickstarter page with any of this info, not even just posting links to the posts on this page which should take what, a couple of minutes?. There has to be some reason why he’s refusing to do this.
Lots to unpack here. There’s Bob claiming to have Fred Smith of FedEx on speed dial. There’s the doxing of a random, minimum wage Kinkos clerk, the call for readers to RISE UP on behalf of Bob’s constitutional right to mass produce photos of naked children bribed with ACTUAL CANDY, or just the whole “Call The Manager” encounter. Amazing find.
Welcome back Bob, What a way to retire… sounds like you’re restarted the WS-199 B/C project from the 50’s but the aim is to strap on a satellite or two. All strength to your arm! I look forward to updates.
[…] #cringely is still around and kicking. He used to write important rants about #ibm and #microsoft #crimes https://www.cringely.com/2020/01/23/not-dead-yet-what-bob-cringely-has-been-up-to/ […]
[…] have been trying to do with my other startup, Eldorado Space.” Eldorado will later this year begin launching into low earth orbit CubeSats up to 12 kilograms in weight. Doing a space startup may seem like the stupidest, highest-risk way to go about […]
Yay! He lives! Great to hear from you again. Life’s been tough for you, and for that, you have my sympathy. Glad to see that you picked yourself up yet again and are doing interesting things. You sir, are an inspiration.
[…] Today, I found out that Bob Cringely has been working on a space startup that will launch CubeSats to orbit using a rapit turnaround method. The details (as such) can be found at his web site, cringely.com. […]
My immediate assumption was that they had bought all the remaining SR-71s on the planet.
However, strapping a 4-meter long 1000kg rocket on the SR-71 while also going Mach 2.2 at 78,000 feet at a 45 degree angle . . . might be problematic? I can’t really say for certain as I haven’t tried it.
Boom Technology . . . seems like not a good fit for the same reasons the SR-71 isn’t, plus more. No XB-1 exists yet; the Baby XB doesn’t even exist yet and has a total payload of just 6000kg – changing the design to hold 1000kg externally would not be easy and would certainly require a bunch of extra engineering; you couldn’t place the rock centrally on top as that affects the jet intake area; the max speed is only Mach 2.2 to start with so with an external rocket mounted it’s certainly not going to be able to attain Mach 2.2 at the top of its service ceiling at a 45 degree upwards angle AND a fairly large airflow obstruction mounted on it.
CubeCab is definitely a similar project but the payloads are something like 1/4 as large and the rockets are largely 3D printed, which Cringely specifically says theirs are not (obviously, to contrast their product, whatever it is, to CubeCab).
I’m still going with mounting them on top of the SR-71s, because I like that idea best.
Cringely raised twice his orginal kickstarter target for Mineserver then managed to spend the lot while claiming he had put in even more of his own money. everythign disappeared ina mysterious fire which he claimed the insurance payout was a done deal. So far no Mineservers and no refunds and Cringely wants more money?
.
This satellite wheeze may be the “stealth start-up” he claimed to be advising.
.
I don’t believe a word Cringely says. If Cringely says something which is true at face value it often turns out to be something else entirely.
Welp, picture at the top is an F-104 Starfighter and per the International F-104 society web page there are no longer any Starfighters for sale and then the Wikipedia page mentioning the now defunct 4Frontiers outfit that also planned to use F-104’s for space launch, plus the other commenters coming to the same conclusion, so I guess that answers the question of launch platform. Uncle Bob’s Rocket Co is launching from cold war air superiority fighters that left USAF service about 50 years ago.
Doubt that Boom has any part of this venture, at least for the next few years.
Glad to read you are back Bob. Many Successes…Still looking for article about Chuck Peddle now that he is dead. You have the history to write about him.
2020 & Space Day’s ! That’s the spirit, way to go Bob! Great to hear from you, do keep the posts going, even if it’s once a month.
Edmund, do you have a website or contact to reach out to regarding your company? I deal in small, family owned businesses looking for an exit. I am personally looking for an opportunity at the moment.
@Ken – re: “legally obliged to give refunds” — No, creators are never (afaik) legally obligated to give refunds. As @Ross pointed out, nothing’s guaranteed and Kickstarter is definitely not a store.
.
What IS required, however, is that creators keep backers in the loop and make them part of the project. THAT is what backers are paying for. And THAT is what Crookely has failed to do. THAT is why people are pissed at him.
.
Yes, there are some people who mistakenly think KS is a store *cough*znaps*cough* but most backers, understand that what they are backing is the project — the process of bringing (or attempting to bring) something to life and they want to be a part of that, at least vicariously. I will admit that the first project I backed I viewed as a sort of store — it was a CD from a band I knew and that I had no reason to think would not deliver. (They did and it was awesome.) Since then, however, I came to understand how Kickstarter really works. Yes, there are projects that didn’t deliver, but so long as they made the backers a part of the process and were open and up front about it, that was okay.
.
Some projects (Peak Design, DoubleSix Dice) do literally make backers part of the process while others simply bring them along for the ride. The Mineserver project started out well but then went downhill quickly and four years of radio silence is unacceptable.
.
Since Crookely has not posted anything about the project on Kickstarter but HAS posted stuff here, some of us came here to find out what the hell is going on.
.
Here’s the thing — If Crookely, who fancies himself a writer — simply logged on to Kickstarter and posted an update saying “hey, here’s what’s happened, the project is dead, it’s over.” that would end it. But he refuses to do even that. So, the ball’s in his court. (Only, he doesn’t have any and thus can’t admit when he’s wrong, let along has failed.)
.
Meanwhile, I’m kicking off my *second* kickstarter this afternoon: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/sinasohn/make-100-a-custom-personalized-limerick-just-for-you
.
But, unlike Crookely, I’ll actually deliver.
Well, on one hand I’m glad to see that Bob is alive and well, and still posting here.
On the other hand, this latest announcement is somewhat concerning. In fact, it sounds delusional.
The narrative that we are expected to believe here is that Bob Cringely really wants to deliver on his promise to ship a small number of $100 servers that consist of some $35 Raspberry Pis in a $4 plastic box with some open source software. It’s a reasonable and achievable goal– I once sat in on a presentation at a tech conference in Vancouver where someone delivered this exact pitch and strategy. Many people have done this.
But Bob can’t do this because his house burned down and people were mean to him on the Internet, so he has to raise the money himself. Okay, so what is his plan to do this?
His plan is to make this money by joining a startup that wants to buy all the world’s remaining Mach 2.2 aircraft and use them to hurl satellites into space.
Just think about this for a moment. Does it sound reasonable? Does it sound achievable?
Remember that Bob was once going to win the Lunar X-Prize by joining a startup that was going to put a robot on the moon.
I think it’s great to dream big, but if you’re constantly dreaming bigger and bigger despite not having accomplished the much smaller and easier dream, it’s not healthy.
This mysterious startup, “Eldorado Space”, does not appear on any Google searches. Are we to assume that this is because they are in “stealth mode”? If so, why would they allow Bob to steal their thunder by announcing all their plans, in great detail, on his own personal website? What kind of aerospace startup operates this way?
I’ll tell you what kind of aerospace startup acts this way. A company that only exists in one person’s imagination. Like this one: http://www.stavatti.com/
Bob is a great writer. His book, “Accidental Empires”, was a great accomplishment, as was the PBS series. “Plane Crazy” was great fun, although it showed Bob’s pattern of taking on more than he could chew: the goal of the series was to design, build, and fly a completely new aircraft in a single month. That failed dramatically, so instead he got some friends (and presumably some people at PBS) to help him build a light plane by assembling an existing kit. Not nearly the same thing.
In that series, Bob took the time to ask a bunch of experts if they thought his original goal was possible. They all said that it wasn’t realistic. He dismissed their expertise and tried to do it anyway, with predictable results.
I would much rather that Bob take the time to write another interesting book about the computer industry. Use the skills that he actually has to produce something that his readers would value. I bought his IBM book and enjoyed it. Surely the money from such a venture would be more than the nebulous value that a computer industry author could add to a (possibly theoretical) aerospace startup consisting of nine engineers. What is Bob’s value-add here? How much startup equity could he possibly earn? Or is he working merely as a consultant? If that is the case, wouldn’t he be under an NDA?
I suspect that we’ll never get any answers to these questions.
Quote:
Welp, picture at the top is an F-104 Starfighter and per the International F-104 society web page there are no longer any Starfighters for sale
Erm, according to this site: https://www.i-f-s.nl/f-104s-for-sale/ there are a bunch of F-104s for sale, from between $325,000 to $1,900,000 depending on condition.
I’m still unsure about how purchasing dwindling supplies of antique aircraft in questionable condition is a sustainable business model, but maybe that’s just me.
Quote:
“Found it! Cringely bought out some F104 Starfights. The venture is called “CubeCab.” http://cubecab.com/”
Some problems with this hypothesis:
1. “CubeCab” is not “Eldorado Space”. The words “Eldorado Space” do not appear anywhere on that website.
2. In Cringely’s post, he says:
“We took 50-year-old ammonium perchlorate composite propellant (the same solid fuel used in the Space Shuttle’s strap-on boosters) and improved it using modern materials, processes, and some common sense. NO 3D printing!”
But on CubeCab’s website, they say:
“For example, rather than complex cryogenic fuels and their associated hardware and insulation, our fuels are room-temperature storable. Because our rockets are small, we can 3D print most of their components in few pieces, keeping the parts count down and reliability up”
You can’t simultaneously have NO 3D printing and “3D print most of their components”.
3. CubeCab sent out a press release in 2017: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/cubecab-to-launch-1000-satellites-for-thumbsat-300492515.html
They also won some kind of pitch competition back in 2014: https://spacenews.com/41482cubecab-wins-lightning-pitch-business-plan-event/
I mean, I suppose it’s theoretically possible that this is the same company, but why use a different name? Why make a point about 3D printing that’s denied on the company’s website? Why would a company that was started in 2014 and ready to launch satellites in 2020 have only nine engineers and one Cringely on the payroll?
So many questions…
Er, seven engineers, not nine. Sorry.
Also, the CEO of CubeCab is Adrian Tymes, who isn’t mentioned in this article.
According to CubeCab’s Twitter, “Dropping our entry to the DARPA Launch Challenge: we launch 5 kg, DLC insists on minimum 10 kg. In talks re: helping another DLC entrant.” https://twitter.com/cubecab/status/1101519140009926657
Cringely says their startup will launch 12kg CubeSats.
So I think it’s fair to say that this isn’t CubeCab.
So the real question now comes down to the photo that Bob posted at the header of this article. If we can figure out where that comes from, we can solve this mystery.
Google Reverse Image search shows that it only appears on Bob’s own site. There is no “Eldorado Space” website that it comes from. But the image clearly shows an F-104 with “ELDORADO” on the side and a rocket underneath. The shot seems pretty close up, enough to see the pilot inside the aircraft.
Well, there’s nothing for it, let’s search for F-104 Lockheed Starfighter. Lots of pretty pictures! That’s a nice looking jet, I have to say.
Hmmm, here’s one:
https://incredible-adventures.com/starfighter/gfx/starfighter-07-full.jpg
It comes from this website:
https://incredible-adventures.com/starfighter/index.html
Some things to note about the photo:
1. It’s from a website called “Incredible Adventures”, where you can buy exciting flights inside fast aircraft, among other things.
2. It has a solid background, making it easy to cut out and Photoshop.
2. Otherwise, it’s exactly the same image and orientation as Bob’s photo, except the logo says “Starfighters” instead of “ELDORADO”, and there is no rocket.
And what’s “Starfighters”?
According to their website, starfighters.net:
“Starfighters operates the world’s only fleet of flight-ready F-104 supersonic aircraft.
Based at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center and operating under authorization from the Federal Aviation Administration, these aircraft are available to government and commercial customers for a variety of missions.”
Now, Starfighters is the sort of company you would contract if you wanted to rent out some F-104s for a commercial mission. In fact, that’s exactly what the company’s business is all about.
But there is no news anywhere on the Internet about a new startup called Eldorado purchasing their entire fleet, or even renting them. And if they had, wouldn’t they have produced a real picture, rather than a Photoshopped one?
I mean, okay, it’s still technically possible that all of this happened, and Bob is being completely honest. Maybe Starfighters Inc. hasn’t announced anything because of secrecy, and the Photoshop was completely authorized by both companies (Starfighter and Eldorado Space) as a “promotional” image, and both companies also authorized Bob to post that image on his own website and nowhere else. This is TECHNICALLY possible.
But there are other possibilities, as well.
I have a prized Spencer The Kat t-shirt that I earned back in the 80s for leaking some info about an upcoming IBM PC graphics card, it always reminds me of Cringley.
Must say that I’m impressed with the space startup.
Are you impressed with the Photoshop job? I must say I am. Turning down the brightness and desaturating the color made it look more real. It is some nice work.
If you open each of these Google searches in two new tabs, you can see the Photoshop work more easily:
https://www.google.com/search?tbs=simg:CAQSygIJSgCONrTd7JQavgILELCMpwgaXgpcCAMSJBcYG8sB1wzKAcEBpwQe2wzVOdQ51ibtIvgphj_1WObY2zCbVJhowT1MqAtjQxNw_1lU8yKejOV0TcBashhb5Js4aZ1ASQ98eCno8va2hTJRJjReQ2l1mDIAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgSUOv27DAsQne3BCRq6AQosChpsb2NraGVlZCBmLTEwNCBzdGFyZmlnaHRlctqliPYDCgoIL20vMGw1M2YKGQoHbWlzc2lsZdqliPYDCgoIL20vMDR5bHQKJwoTc3VwZXJzb25pYyBhaXJjcmFmdNqliPYDDAoKL20vMDI1c2IydwopChZncm91bmQgYXR0YWNrIGFpcmNyYWZ02qWI9gMLCgkvbS8wMThyYzEKGwoJYWlyIGZvcmNl2qWI9gMKCggvbS8wMTNtMQw&q=lockheed+f-104+starfighter&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwistPS1iafnAhWdCTQIHYv4ARkQ2A4oAXoECAgQKA&biw=1536&bih=762&dpr=1.25#imgrc=2dPMgOWDMArB2M:
https://www.google.com/search?q=f-104+lockheed+starfighter&rlz=1C1GCEU_enCA823CA828&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi54P7jiafnAhWgIDQIHQzWDxMQ_AUoAXoECBEQAw&biw=1536&bih=762&dpr=1.25#imgrc=rZMvPAQQnVsa5M:
They are EXACTLY the same image, save for the background and added “rocket”.
The original image is 800×534, whereas the Photoshop is 1600×1068, which is exactly doubled. You can see the artifacts of the pixel doubling if you open the Photoshop in a new tab and zoom in.
You have just gained a new fan <3 !
@Jeremy Reimer, you are a stud. Great finds! Can you Photoshop me brandishing a pitchfork? I want Bob to know how much this bothers me!
Wow, great work Jeremy! This may be evidence there’s at least one other person involved in this. Bob can’t fix a WP blog that’s been broken for years. Maybe photoshopping to spin tall tales is the next Cringely clan adventure. After all, in the announcement of the Mine Server he added this: “This is not rocket science. That’s next year.”
ELEVEN ATTEMPTS to get that comment through. Your satellites are in good hands, corporate America!
Jeremy – very nice work. The Incredible Adventures website DOES say, though, that the Starfighter adventure is not currently available – so I suppose it is possible that that unavailability is due to the planes being sold to Eldorado. We will find out soon enough I guess.
Yay! Glad to have you back! Looking forward to reading more updates on this.
Quote: “Jeremy – very nice work. The Incredible Adventures website DOES say, though, that the Starfighter adventure is not currently available – so I suppose it is possible that that unavailability is due to the planes being sold to Eldorado.”
I suppose this is possible. Let’s check using the Internet Archives to find out *when* the Incredible Adventures offer became unavailable. If it’s recent, your theory might be possible.
The first instance of the “currently unavailable” change is in October 2012:
https://web.archive.org/web/20121022160134/https://incredible-adventures.com/starfighter/index.html
So it’s unlikely that an Eldorado purchase caused this unavailability, unless we are to believe that Eldorado Space has been in stealth mode for nearly eight years without so much as a single press release anywhere on the Internet.
What’s more likely is that the partnership between Incredible Adventures and Starfighters, Inc. changed in 2012 and they were no longer able to offer this service. The Wikipedia page for Starfighters Inc. says: “In recent years the company has cut back on air show appearances as they have transitioned to using their aircraft for government and private contract work, providing high-performance photo chase planes on flight tests, simulating enemy aircraft in military defense exercises, and modelling ballistic missiles for detection system evaluation.” and the link provided is an article in Aircraft magazine, August 2011, titled “Starfighters Inc Receives Italian F-104s.” This lines up nicely with Incredible Adventures no longer being able to offer their service.
Now, it’s still theoretically possible that Cringely and a helpful billionaire bought out Starfighters Inc. wholesale. However, there is no indication of this anywhere on the Internet. No press release, nothing.
The Starfighter.net website still indicates availability for corporate, academic, and government partnerships, including NASA. Their Facebook page doesn’t get many posts, but the latest one is from August 2019, and seems to indicate business as usual: https://www.facebook.com/StarfightersAerospace/
In fact, there was an article from 2011 on NASA’s website, coinciding with Starfighters’ purchase of the five Italian F-105s, stating that one of the possibilities for NASA was launching small satellites on a rocket: https://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/news/starfighters.html
Later, in 2016, there was an article on the BBC website about the infamous CubeCab, who planned to partner (partner, not buy) with Starfighters Inc. to launch the satellites that we’ve already determined are not Cringely’s (or Eldorado’s) satellites: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20160826-the-1950s-jet-launching-tiny-satellites Not much detail here, just that they hoped to launch them in 2018. Obviously that didn’t happen, but CubeCab is still trying to make it happen.
So we do know that: Starfighters Inc. exists and has done for a while, and that they operate out of Cape Canaveral and partner with NASA as well as other companies and academia. We know that the startup CubeCab planned to rent out Starfighter’s F-104s to launch small satellites, but hasn’t managed to do so yet. We know that CubeCab never planned to buy out Starfighters Inc, but simply partner with them.
And we know that Bob Cringely posted a Photoshopped photo of a F-104 with the “Starfighters” logo removed and “ELDORADO” added, and boasted of co-founding a new startup that has already bought out all the F-104s in the world, and THIS YEAR is planning to launch small satellites, only with a bigger payload (of course!) than CubeCab.
Again, technically it is possible that this “Eldorado” entity purchased Starfighters, Inc. wholesale, and that every aspect of Cringely’s story is true. It’s something a billionaire would be able to do. However, most billionaires like to announce when they do something, especially something this cool. Why does Bob get to announce it instead? And why would a billionaire bother to Photoshop their logo on a picture of a plane from 2011, from some third-party customer of Starfighters, Inc., when they would literally own it? They could simply repaint it with the new logo and hire a professional photographer to create a beauty shot, maybe on the ground to go along with the press conference.
So many questions. But who knows? Maybe we’ll find out the answers this century.
I’d just like to point out that I’m not trying to piss all over the idea of launching satellites into space using high-speed military jets; it’s a cool and innovative concept.
And I’m not (deliberately) trying to call Bob a liar either. If this turns out to be a real thing, I’ll be happy for Bob and will gladly admit my skepticism was in error, in public, on this blog.
But a lot of things don’t add up, and the Photoshop job is suspicious. Maybe it’s just Bob exaggerating for the sake of a good story. Or maybe the story is really someone else’s story and he’s just attaching himself to it. Or maybe it’s entirely fictional, but based on real life events.
There is an actual rapid launch-satellites-into-space challenge going on right now, and it’s scheduled for early 2020. It’s the DARPA Launch Challenge, the same one CubeCat said they were bowing out of but helping an “unnamed” competitor with last year. Could this be the mysterious Eldorado?
https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2019-10-22
“The remaining qualifying competitor is a space startup comprising industry veterans currently operating in stealth mode while the company works toward internal technical milestones. The team will receive notification of the first launch site in January 2020 with the first launch window targeted for February. Virgin Orbit, which entered the competition via its wholly owned subsidiary, VOX Space, exited the competition in October to focus on its upcoming commercial launches. A third team, Vector Launch, withdrew from the Challenge in September due to a change in the company’s structure and financial status.”
This still wouldn’t explain the “purchasing of all the remaining F-104s in the world” (for which there is no evidence) or the Photoshop (which seems sloppy), but if we consider those to be exaggerations, I suppose it’s possible that this “stealth mode” startup is Eldorado. It’s still weird to allow your co-founder to tell the world who you are but not let DARPA do so, but weird things do sometimes happen.
Anyway, we’ll know by February.
I think I figured out why the Photoshop is bothering me so much.
Normally, when a company isn’t ready to show real products, they generate some quick 3D renderings to show people what their eventual product might look like. These renderings are typically not done photorealistically, because they are meant to be obvious placeholders. Everyone understands that they are the equivalent of concept sketches. It’s a well-understood process.
I’ve never seen a company Photoshop their name on someone else’s manipulated stock photo and use it to headline a major announcement. Clearly some effort was taken to make the photo look realistic.
Can you think of any company that has ever done this?
Glad your still alive Mr. Cringely, now could you say something about IBM? I know you know each other. What do you think about Ginni’s departure and what will happen next?
So first he shat up tech journalism, then he shat up game servers, and now he will shit up space with useless micropenis satellite in name only junk in service of the jew golem of a country.
A fitting trajectory for a hack, with hopefully a noose at the end.
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] pode ficar na prateleira por anos e ser lançado conforme necessário dentro de horas ", ele escreveu em seu blog. "Nos oferecemos lançar com antecedência de QUATRO horas e, em seguida, iniciar novamente a […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] rocket that may sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed inside hours,” he wrote on his weblog. “We have supplied to launch on FOUR hours discover after which launch once more each TWO […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours,” he wrote on his weblog. “We’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] that may sit down at the shelf for years then be introduced as-needed inside of hours,” he wrote on his blog. “Now we have presented to release on FOUR hours realize after which release once more each […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] that may take a seat at the shelf for years then be introduced as-needed inside of hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We’ve got presented to release on FOUR hours understand after which release once more […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] that may sit down at the shelf for years then be introduced as-needed inside of hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We have introduced to release on FOUR hours understand after which release once more each […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours," he wrote on his blog. "We've offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours," he wrote on his blog. "We've offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours," he wrote on his blog. "We've offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours,” he wrote on his blog. “We’ve offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
Wow, that’s a LOT of spam.
@Jeremy — Yeah, and there’s a bunch in the comments too.
Lol, that made me chuckle. 🙂
Here’s a neat story on the founder of Starfighters, Inc., Rick Svetkoff, from December 19, 2019.
https://www.flyingmag.com/story/pilot-proficiency/repurposing-a-starfighter/
——————————————————————
“Rick purchased the first Starfighter in 1995 and then bought two other F-104s shortly thereafter. By 1996, the three airplanes became the only Starfighter performers in the world, with Lakeland’s Sun ’n Fun being one of the first events. At the time, Rick was still gainfully employed as a Continental Airlines pilot, a career he had begun in 1984 after the Navy.
When the writing on the walls indicated that seniority and quality of life had the potential to change unfavorably in 2006 because of the looming United Airlines merger, Rick elected to hang up his hat as a 767 captain. After 22 years, he retired early at the age of 51, eagerly devoting all of his time to his Starfighter career.
In the background, NASA presented Rick with a new and potentially more lucrative opportunity. That being said, those of us who have become accustomed to a comfortable, steady paycheck—especially with years of longevity—tend to remain married to the airline rather than take a risk with the unknown. Rick had a wife, two kids and millions of dollars’ worth of airplanes to feed.
With the demands of the airshow circuit taking their toll, and slim profit margins despite sponsorships, it seemed the time was ripe to explore a new possibility with NASA. Because of activity starting to buzz in the commercial space industry, the agency asked Starfighters Inc. if they would consider a proposal to fly hardware designed to be flown aboard commercial spacecraft. Rather than find out too late that a piece of equipment would break or malfunction when subjected to high G-loads or high speeds, the F-104 would become the test vehicle. The airplane very closely simulates the G-forces experienced during a launch cycle.”
——————————————————————
What we see here is that Starfighters, Inc. is a lifelong passion project, and is able to survive financially (operating a fleet of Mach 2.2 aircraft is expensive, who knew?) only because of a close partnership with NASA. And we see that it was still operating only a month ago.
Let’s pretend that Bob’s mystery company actually bought out Starfighters, Inc. Wouldn’t they have to notify NASA first? Remember that NASA is a government agency that operates on government timelines– projects have to be procured and planned months if not years in advance.
Are we expected to believe that this all happened in LESS THAN A MONTH, yet with no announcement anywhere in the world except for Cringely’s blog?
Maybe someone should contact Starfighters, Inc. and ask them. They have a contact form on their blog: https://www.starfighters.net/contact
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours," he wrote on his blog. "We've offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
Sorry, the story is from December 12, 2019, not December 19, 2019.
Still, that’s only slightly over a month, and over the Christmas break as well, a time when most people are on holiday.
[…] rocket that can sit on the shelf for years then be launched as-needed within hours," he wrote on his blog. "We've offered to launch on FOUR hours notice and then launch again every TWO hours […]
Stop spamming this article!
Seriously, this is weird that there all all these different websites I’ve never even heard of spamming the comment section with links to their own weird websites, on which they all have EXACTLY THE SAME TEXT of a “rocket update” article in one section of which they report on THIS article, saying (in essence): “Hey, Cringely used to be a tech reporter and now he’s saying he’s launching rockets, but lots of people claim to have simple answers to complex problems”.
Which is a fair assessment, but… what are these websites? “Berlintomorrow”? “Moscownewsdaily”? Who runs these? Why are they spamming a blog with links to identical copies of an article about that blog article?
Much like the reason for Photoshopping a logo onto a F-104, I suspect that we’ll never get the answer to this question.
First I had nowhere to send flowers.
But I love your Idea and time to sort it.
I believe the plane is the Concord And hope it is. What a way to travel to space and beyond!
It is clearly not the Concorde. From WIkipedia:
.
– maximum speed over twice the speed of sound, at Mach 2.04
– Cringely posted a Photoshop of a F-104, not a Concorde
– 18 out of 20 are currently on display in museums
– the possibility of reviving them is laughable in the short term:
“former Concorde captain and Club Concorde co-founder William “Jock” Lowe, who was quoted in June 2016 saying:[249]
.
Let’s assume you could rip the whole thing apart and ultrasound the fuselage. There are thousands, many thousands of hydraulic seals on the airplane. … Every one of them would have to be remanufactured and replaced. [But] the manufacturing facilities are just not there. … And if you got them all together, what sort of testing regimen would be there? … It took seven years of flight testing to get it into service in the first place.”
.
So no, it’s not the Concorde.
I mean, it’s not anything, at the moment, other than a Photoshop of someone else’s picture of a plane.
It’s really bizarre. People post comments here as if they were just unfrozen from a block of ice and have a really hard time understanding anything and missed the last 5,000 years of history.
Well, I finally found Bob’s old column from 2007 on his plan to win the Google X-Prize by landing rovers on the Moon.
He titled it: “To the Moon, Alyce!: Team Cringely will win the Google Lunar X Prize.”
https://web.archive.org/web/20071011022050/http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/2007/pulpit_20070927_003043.html
Some key takeaways:
“A group from Carnegie Mellon University, for example, this week announced its intention to compete by issuing a press release. If only I had thought of that.”
“I am 100 percent sure that Carnegie Mellon will build a better rover than Team Cringely (like the name?), but I am just as certain that my team will beat their team to the Moon.”
“I’ll be revealing these team members as the effort progresses, but among my partners in crime are several senior space scientists from Russia who have already landed and driven rovers on the Moon.”
“The Google Lunar X Prize gives until 2012 for contestants to get to the Moon and drive around, but I intend to win or fail in 18 months.”
“Team Cringely will build its own rocket, thanks, and being too poor to afford real estate, we’ll launch ours from an airplane.”
I mean, we have all the same hubris and absurd confidence, THIRTEEN YEARS AGO, that we’ve seen in this post in 2020. We have the mysterious team members who can’t be named, the same absurd boasting about how they will “win”, the same lack of admitting defeat, ever.
Team Cringely never made it to the Moon, of course. Not even close. Tthe only thing the “team” ever produced was a really boring animation about lunar orbits that Bob posted on his YouTube channel, while claiming he *almost* got Steve Jobs to fund it.
I mean, there are patterns in a person’s life, and then there are pathologies.
There is actually an Eldorado company in the OpenCorporates database, with Mark Stephens and Tomas Svitek as directors: https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_hi/102164F1
That’s a great find. What it says is this:
1. Cringely and Tomas Svitek know each other (of course, we already know this, as Svitek’s name is on the end of the lunar orbit video that Cringely posted on his YouTube channel), and
2. Either one of them paid the $89 that is required to incorporate a business in the State of Delaware (Division of Corporation fees ($50), filing fee tax ($15 minimum), and the county fee ($24))
So Bob isn’t making the *entire* thing up. He’s worked with Svitek before in his crazy scheme to land a rover on the Moon. Svitek is an actual rocket engineer. In that venture, Svitek provided the plans, and Cringely attempted to raise the money. Svitek delivered plans, but Bob failed to raise the money.
So what’s probably happened here is that Svitek has a plan but no money, and Cringely is promising to raise the money (ie, find investors) and do all the promotion.
But here’s the thing: this is not the way you promote something when you are looking for investors. Here’s what you would actually do:
1. Get some seed money from family and friends
2. Use this seed money to create a highly polished website and pitch deck
3. Write a press release and send it to multiple news organizations, then publish the press release on your site
4. Use the publicity to attract meetings with investors so you can pitch to them
Here’s what you would NOT do:
1. Make an obvious Photoshop of your company logo on someone else’s plane with a fake rocket, pretending to be a real rocket
2. Post this Photoshop on your PERSONAL website along with a long, grandiose post claiming things that you have zero proof of (like purchasing all the Mach 2.2 aircraft in the world) and hope for the best
3. Never engage with any of the people who express skepticism (based on YOUR bad track record) in the comments
4. But, IN THE SAME POST, complain about how people in the comments are ruining your OTHER company and preventing it from getting any investors.
That’s a strategy for failure.
Well, my weird obsession with the mysterious Eldorado has born fruit.
I just got off the phone with Rick Svetkoff, the founder and owner of Starfighters Aerospace. Remember how earlier in this thread I mentioned there was a contact form on the Starfighters.net website? Well, I used it. And he got in touch with me.
To be blunt: Starfighters has NOT BEEN SOLD. There was never any negotiation for its sale, nor is there any potential of a sale in the future.
He did confirm that Eldorado was in TALKS to potentially PARTNER with Starfighters (as many other companies have done– see the Starfighters.net website for a list of companies, including CubeCab), but that the talks were preliminary only and there was no signing of any “term sheet”, which means that no money has changed hands, and there is no contract yet for any money to change hands.
Rick was a pleasant and honest person to talk to. He mentioned that there were a lot of “tire kickers” in this business. I think we all know what that means.
I wasn’t going to even post anything about our conversation, out of respect for Rick, but then I realized that I had already commented in this thread that there was the faintest POSSIBILITY that Starfighters had been sold. Rick asked that I not spread this rumor because it could reflect badly on his company, which makes sense– potential investors in Starfighters might be spooked by such rumors, as unfounded as they might be.
So then I realized I had to set the record straight, and do it here, in the only place in which this rumor exists. To repeat: STARFIGHTERS AEROSPACE IS *NOT* SOLD AND IS *NOT* FOR SALE. Eldorado did NOT negotiate to purchase the company.
Therefore, Cringely’s statement that Eldorado “bought all of them [the Mach 2.2+ launch aircraft]” is FALSE.
This should be the last word on the matter.
@Jeremy Reimer my only sadness is that I fear most of your research will fall on minimal/no ears as the majority of readers no longer look back at these “historical” posts and just look to the most recent post I imagine. As a result, Bob comes out still looking clean as a whistle to anyone who read it when it was a new post, as you can see in the many congratulations in the early comments. So despite that you more or less blew the lid off of this thing, Bob gets away scot-free with a big grin on his face.
Anywho, well done. *I* enjoyed it at least. This has been a pleasure following you around for this wild ride! Thanks!
Well, like the people burned by Mineservers, I have no problem in bringing up Bob’s lack of honesty in his most recent posts as well. I will don the necessary pitchfork and march as necessary. Glad you enjoyed the ride. 🙂
@Jeremy — What did Rick from Starfighters have to say about the IP theft of his photograph?
@Roger, I did not mention the IP theft of the photograph in my call with Rick. I didn’t want to get into any tricky details, just ask for his comment on the rumor of a buyout.
In any case, the IP for the photograph technically belongs to Incredible Adventures, who used to contract out individual rides from Starfighters Inc back when Starfighters was a smaller operation. Given the lack of updates on the Incredible Adventures website, it’s possible they wouldn’t know or care about the theft.
And neither did Bob. It was just the best candidate picture for Photoshopping a F-104 that shows up in a Google Image Search. I’m really quite amazed that Bob didn’t think that other people could use Google Image Search as well.
But then again, maybe I shouldn’t be so surprised.
Alan, the most recent post usually means for about six months.
I also don’t see how investors will show up when Bob reveals that the money will be used to bailout another his MineServer company.
Cringely shouldn’t be surprised about hassles with insurance companies when he lies about what was lost in the fire.
@Jeremy – another thumbs-up from me – your “weird obsession” has been a good ride for back-seat drivers like me. Feeling a bit sad just the same, since despite all the warning signs and prior fizzles of Cringley (another big thing of his back in the day was foil-based disk platters, with which his plucky band of scrappy underdogs were going to sweep the floor) I do hanker for the spirit of P. T. Farnsworth. Regrettably this is more P. T. Barnum….
One minor update to this saga, since I mentioned it earlier in the comments:
The Darpa Launch Challenge is now underway (the first launch is delayed a couple of days because of bad weather). The final team involved was not named for the longest time– they were a described as a “Stealth” team– but now that they are actually ramping up to the launch they have revealed themselves.
Quote:
“The Team: Astra was incorporated in October 2016 and is located in Alameda, California, just east of San Francisco. Astra’s leadership team includes industry and government space veterans Chris Kemp (CEO), Dr. Adam London (CTO), and Chris Thompson (VP, Engineering). Astra currently employees 160 engineers, scientists, technicians, and staff. Focusing on low-cost fabrication techniques and a software-driven approach to manufacturing, the company’s objective is to achieve daily space deliveries of small satellites without rideshare brokering and with minimal launch infrastructure.”
https://www.darpalaunchchallenge.org/about.html
Note that none of these people have anything to do with Bob Cringely or his partner Tomas Svitek. In retrospect it was silly of me to even engage in the slightest bit of speculation that they might be involved.
But in any case, it’s nice to close that final loophole. There are lots of cool videos on the DARPA Launch Challenge website. It’s neat seeing actual rocket scientists and the real work that they do, instead of reading lies from con men.
Time to go buy Jeremy’s books as a modest concrete “Thank you!” <3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pL3Yzjk5R4M
The Original Skunk Works
If you choose a casino, then only licensed, as this online institution is. In principle, this was one of the main criteria when choosing a casino. In addition to the license, it attracts the interface with its simplicity and clarity, as well as technical support feedback at any time of the day or night. If I had to choose a casino again, I would choose this https://onlinenodepositslot.com/no-deposit-bonus/.
This is pretty cool. A commercialization of the ASAT program. Are you using F15s? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASM-135_ASAT
He is not using anything, other than a Photoshop of someone else’s picture of another company’s F-104. Please read my comments above for the full story.
F-104 Starfighters. Interesting choice. Now that you have me thinking jets and speed. Have you ever met or heard of Jon Ward of the 1969 24 Hours of Daytona fame? He is known for his engineering ingenuity. Speaking of the F-104; rest in peace Jessi Combs.
It was an interesting choice of planes to Photoshop and lie about owning, yes.
Ha ha, this guy reminds me of trump… never stop lying, never apologize, never admit anything!
Gaslighting and lying as he has done for years.