Remember when Bluetooth phone headsets came along and suddenly there were all these people loudly talking to themselves in public? Schizoid behavior became, if not cool, at least somewhat tolerable. Well expect the same experience now that Google Glass is hitting the street, because contrary to nearly any picture you can find of the thing, when you actually use it most of your time is spent looking up and to the right, where the data is. I call it the Google Gaze.
Only time will tell how traffic courts will come to view Google Glass, but having finally tried one I suspect it may end up on that list of things we’re supposed to drive without.
Another suspicion I have on the basis of five minutes wearing the device is that it will be a huge success for Google. That doesn’t mean Google will sell millions, because I don’t think that’s the idea. I expect we’ll see compatible devices shortly from nearly all Android vendors and the real market impact will be from units across a broad range of brands at a wide range of prices.
And that’s fine with Google, because their plan, I’m sure, is to make money on the data, not the device.
I didn’t think much of the gadget until I tried it and then I instantly realized that it would create a whole new class of apps that I’d call sneaky. A sneaky app is one that quietly provides contextual information the way I imagine a brilliant assistant (if I ever had one) would slip me a note with some key piece of data concerning my meeting, talk, class, phone call, negotiation, argument, etc., just at the moment I most need it.
Google Glass and a bunch of sneaky apps will change my mandate from being prepared to being ready, because you can’t prepare for everything but if you can react quickly enough you can be ready for anything.
But there’s still that mindless stare up and to the right, a telltale giveaway that sneaky things are afoot.
Bob,
It looks like you wear glasses; so do I. What I see a lot of people asking, but absolutely no answers is how does this thing work for those of us who don’t have an option but wear glasses? Are we all supposed to get lasik?
What is even more interesting is the fact that these glasses record instantly everything that YOU do as well. so, checking out the new secretary’s outfit – now that’s a sexual harassment case. I would imaging that there will be a lot of blocking applications and naturally, sponsored glasses, with LIMITED vision (Adidas sponsored glasses will block Nike logo) or filtered content (blurred Victoria Secret display in the mall – huge success in Saudi Arabia). Probably, in some places, government will force citizens to wear it so they can track anything that people hear, see and say. it will start in a small scale – policemen will be forced to wear it as part of “increasing public trust”, then it will go to teachers (“to better understand students”), bus drivers, pilots, nurses, any service providers and soon we have a very “transparent society”.
Sneaky? I wouldn’t worry about that.
Very sneaky indeed.
If breaks the “coolest new gadget” string of successes from Apple. It changes the conversation, not a phone, not a tablet. It is new and different. That is a huge disruption for Apple, and MS.
Why Microsoft? They are (used to be fast follower) who by version 3.1 gets does the thing right, cheaper and backwards compatible. We have only seen version 1 of their tablet, and version 2 of Bing. Now they have something new to chase.
FYI – Microsoft has been in the tablet and touch-interface business for over a decade. The latest “Surface/RT” and “Surface Pro” tablets are like version 10 or 11 of their tablet devices, not version 1.
Why don’t you know more about Microsoft’s history in the tablet business? B/c it’s been such an abysmal failure due to their instance that it is just another form factor for the Windows Desktop that they have tried their best to hide in with the release of the Surface/RT and Surface Pro – despite having previously used the Surface brand. 😉
OK – a dumb question.
I wear bifocal glasses – top half is for distance viewing and bottom for close up work (like the screen I am looking at). Are the optics for the “google glass” compatible with that set up?
I am guessing no and a quick google search doesn’t find much to go by.
same here. for me, this would be just as useful as 3DTV, as the left eye is not recognized as reliable by my brain.
Vernon Vinge does a great job painting a picture of society with google type glasses in Rainbows End.
Loved that book…if I remember correctly the technology was worked into contact lenses.
This pretty much sums up the fate of Google Glass:
http://theinteractivist.com/messages-from-the-future-the-fate-of-google-glass/
Good read and I don’t want to go back to wearing glasses! Yuck, I spent WAY to long tied to those things and contact lenses. The best $3,500 bucks I ever spent was on Lasik surgery.
How about a lens implant with Glass, now THAT’S 21st century.
But applications will be what really drives these things into wide acceptance and usage, some killer app that is just to good to do without…………hummmmmm, need to think on that before anyone gets to excited.
Interesting read, but I don’t think it’ll play out that way.
Yes, it may fade into the background – but most likely b/c of what Bob said – others picking it up. The best thing that could happen would be for existing eye glass manufacturers to pick it up and integrate it, or make easy add-ons that people could put on their glasses.
Yes, I wear glasses – typically replace them about every 2 years or so as my prescription changes slightly – enough it makes a big difference when I get new ones. A nice little add-on or built-in to my next pair might be nice. It has to work.
It’ll also go contact-lense style when the tech gets there – which it is. There’s already manufacturers experimenting with putting HUD displays into contact lenses; it’s just not economical yet – but glasses are.
More likely than not, it’ll expand out so that the HUD part of it takes up the entire vision field at some point – or some customizable part of it. (Don’t like looking to the upper right; find – put it to the bottom right,or center right, or…)
It’ll lose its name “Google Glass” not because it fails, but b/c it will succeed so spectacularly that the final product won’t come from or be approved by Google.
What the author or your link missed, is that this fictious person won’t know it by the name “Google Glass” but by something else. Kind of like the VCRs, DVRs, etc. No one really associates the name VCR or DVR with the company that originally invented them; but everyone knows the technology. That will be the fate of Google Glass – but we don’t yet know what name it’ll be that everyone will grab onto.
(FYI – DVR was not the original name for the DVRs either. So it’s also a prime example of the name change happening to such a big extent that we don’t commonly know what the original technology was called – ReplayTV.)
Yep, a very good read and pretty much on the money, I’d say. Trouble is, just as the first cellphones were the size of a loaf of bread, cost the price of a half-decent car and were toted by attention-seeking chode-tuggers, they soon shrank in size and price to a point where a child could buy one with pocket money. Something will come up. Google Glass will be brief and transient and will be supplanted by something usable and invisible. Such a horrible thought.
When the cost comes down some then I’ll be using them – the naysayers have no imagination …. just imagine what these will to to the political debates (no more odd bumps under Bush’s suit during the debates) and sportscasters, interviewers, newscasters etc having almost instant feedback without the earpieces. In the technical field, the ability to record just what you are doing and get instant feedback – a medical version will be out very quickly I think, military field trauma surgeons having almost instant access to the soldiers medical details …
Current “computerization” of medical records seems to be evolving around tablets – which are just terrible for face to face interaction with the patient because the doctor is always looking at the tablet, not the patient … so the potential in the medical field is probably huge.
And other fields too – suppose you are buying a car – and the car salesman gets your name and a few more bits of information … and the backroom IT folks do a wallet biopsy while you are standing talking to them and feed your credit information back to them …
This is very much a “Google” device …
You WILL become one with the Borg
Contextual data means either (i) Glass knows your location or (ii) the Glass camera can take a photo, upload it to the Googleplex and then download some nonsense about the photo.
Yes Google servers win again.
What Bob didn’t say is whether he would really wear these or it was just a cool thing to try. My smartphone is always beside me now. Will Google Glass achieve that level of attachment?
Is there a flashing red light when recording? I think that should be mandatory, as the (what ever you call the upper right hand electronic box) will eventually be invisible…possibly incorporated into the frame. Eventually, though, ALL will be recorded, it just has to happen.
Hmm… always the right eye… Guess I’m safe as I am blind in that eye.
John Gruber has already coined the wearers of Google Glass as Glassholes.
Maybe wearable computers are the next frontier, but I don’t see this as the right combination to make that work. IMO Google Glass will end up like tablet computer from ten years ago. They’ll be useful for certain vertical applications but won’t achieve any real horizontal market.
Yet more data for the NSA to put in their planned petabytes of storage at Bluffdale!
So it’s really Google Inception?
Who wants to mount a video camera and microphone on them for Google to monitor every waking moment?
Type your passwords without looking!
I have conflicting feelings toward this. I think it’s awesome for people that are disabled and can’t snap photos themselves, but then again, any creep could be snapping photos of people and they would never know :/
Both a great idea AND an issue. Suggest making the next model less google & more glassy. That’ll really start some stuff.
So its going to track everything you do….. can anyone say 1984 lol
[…] Cringely says things are looking up for Google Glass, and Robert Scoble says he will never again live a day without wearing it. […]
[…] Cringely says things are hunting up for Google Glass, and parliamentarian Scoble says he module never again live a day without act it. […]
[…] Cringely says things are hunting up for Google Glass, and parliamentarian Scoble says he module never again live a day without act it. […]
[…] Cringely says things are looking up for Google Glass, and Robert Scoble says he will never again live a day without wearing it. […]
[…] Cringely says things are looking up for Google Glass, and Robert Scoble says he will never again live a day without wearing it. […]
[…] Cringely says things are looking up for Google Glass, and Robert Scoble says he will never again live a day without wearing it. […]
Sounds like the system Ah-nuld had in “True Lies”
[…] Cringely says things are looking up for Google Glass, and Robert Scoble says he will never again live a day without wearing it. […]
[…] Cringely says things are looking up for Google Glass, and Robert Scoble says he will never again live a day without wearing it. […]
[…] Cringely says things are looking up for Google Glass, and Robert Scoble says he will never again live a day without wearing it. […]
Google Glasses are just an start for wat comes next. But for the moment this glasses are very limited
[…] More information Things are looking up for Google Glass | I, Cringely […]