The Innovator’s Dilemma, a 1997 book by Harvard professor Clayton Christensen, made the point that successful companies can lose their way when they pay too much attention to legacy products and not enough attention to new stuff. They are making so much money they either don’t see a competitor rising up or are too complacent to feel threatened. In either case the incumbent generally loses and the upstart (usually one of many) generally wins. The best way for successful companies to avoid this problem is by inventing the future before their competitors do.
We see this pattern over and over in high tech. Remember Lotus? Remember Word Perfect? Remember Borland? And it’s not just in software. Remember IBM sticking too long with the 80286 processor? Remember the Osbourne Executive?
Microsoft certainly faces this dilemma today, having nothing with which to replace Windows and Office. Some say Apple, too, is living now on the wrong side of the innovation curve, but I don’t think so. I think Cupertino has a plan.
When Apple announced its iPhone 5c and 5s mobile phones I alluded to having an idea of some broader strategy Cupertino had in mind for the devices, especially the iPhone 5S. Here are the clues I am working from:
1) Tim Cook was clear to claim the iPhone 5S had a “workstation-class 64-bit processor.”
2) iWork is now free on all new iOS devices.
3) iOS 7 has, for the first time, support for not just Bluetooth keyboards but Bluetooth mice as well.
4) There’s a new Apple TV of some sort coming anytime now.
Here’s what I think is happening. At the very moment when Apple critics are writing-off the company as a three- or four- or five-hit wonder, Apple is embracing the fact that desktop computers only represent about 15 percent of its income, making Apple clearly a mobile technology company. As such, it is more important for Apple to expand its mobile offerings than its desktops. So Apple in a sense is about to make the Macintosh deliberately obsolete.
This doesn’t mean Apple is going out of the Mac business. Why would they drop a hardware platform that still delivers industry-leading profit margins? But a growing emphasis from here on out will be the role of iOS on the desktop.
I see the iPhone 5S and whatever follows as logical desktop replacements. They, and phones like them, will be the death of the PC.
Jump forward in time to a year from today. Here’s what I expect we’ll see. Go to your desk at work and, using Bluetooth and AirPlay, the iPhone 5S or 6 in your pocket will automatically link to your keyboard, mouse, and display. Processing and storage will be in your pocket and, to some extent, in the cloud. Your desktop will require only a generic display, keyboard, mouse, and some sort of AirPlay device, possibly an Apple TV that looks a lot like a Google ChromeCast.
That’s what I have running in the picture on this page, only with my iPhone 5 and iOS 7. A year from now I expect the apps will detect and fill the larger screen. And that Mac-in-your-pocket will have not only iWork installed, but also Microsoft Office, which Microsoft will be forced to finally release for iOS. Apple making iWork free on new devices — devices powerful enough for this desktop gambit — guarantees that Microsoft will comply.
Go home and take your work with you. Go on the road and it is there, too. IT costs will drop for businesses as desktop PCs are replaced. Having a desktop at home will cost in the $200 range, bringing costs for home IT down, too.
Why would Apple do this? Well for one thing if they don’t Google will. For that matter Google will, anyway, so Apple has some incentive to get this in the market pronto.
There are other reasons why Apple would do this. For one thing it is much more likely to hurt the PC market than the Mac market, since pocket desktop performance probably won’t be there for Apple’s core graphics and video markets. Mac sales might actually increase as sales are grabbed from faltering Windows vendors.
But in the end it doesn’t really matter to Apple what happens to the Mac since they are a phone company now. And by embracing their phone-i-ness, Apple will be giving its mobile business a huge boost. Want an iPhone desktop? That will require a new phone, probably sooner than you would otherwise have upgraded. If you are thinking of this new phone as your total computing environment, albeit backed-up to the cloud, you’ll be inclined to spend more on that phone, opting for the maximum configuration. Apple makes a higher profit on maxed-out iPhones than on base phones. And instead of upgrading your desktop every 2-3 years, you’ll now be doing it every 1-2 years.
But wait, there’s more! This desktop gambit completely bypasses Wintel. There’s no pro-Windows bias in the phone market. If anything there’s an anti-Windows bias, so Apple will be playing to its strength. This will be a huge blow to Microsoft, Windows, and Office, yet Redmond will lean into it in an attempt to save Office. Either that or die.
This is a chance for Apple to reinvent the desktop exactly as they reinvented the music player, the mobile phone, and the tablet. For those who say Apple can’t do it again, Apple is already doing it again.
Ironically, for all the stories I’ve been reading about the death of the desktop, this strategy I am laying-out guarantees a desktop resurgence of sorts — only one that won’t help Dell or HP a bit.
Now take this idea one step further. There’s an opportunity here for Apple to promote yet another hardware platform — a mobile interface to go with that iPhone. This is a device I seriously considered doing myself for Android a couple years ago but the performance just wasn’t yet there.
You see for all the advantages of having a desktop in your pocket, we really prefer larger displays and even keyboards to do actual work. Tablets have their place, but that place is not everywhere. Commodity desktop peripherals are easy to provide at work and home but much more difficult on the road. Use an iPad to give a bigger screen to your iPhone? That doesn’t make sense. So I expect Apple to build for road warriors a new class of devices that have the display, keyboard and trackpad of a notebook but without the CPU, memory or storage. Call it a MacBook Vacuum, because it’s a MacBook Air without the air.
More likely, since it’s an iOS device, Apple will call this gizmo an iSomething. It will be impossibly strong and light — under a pound — the battery will last for days, and it ought to cost $199 for 11-inch and $249 for 13-inch, but Apple being Apple they’ll charge $249 and $349.
What I’m predicting, then, is an Apple resurgence. But let’s understand something here: this is yet another product class that Apple will dominate for awhile then eventually lose. It’s a 3-5 year play just like the iPod, iPhone, and iPad. Google and Amazon will be in hot pursuit, each more willing than Apple to pay to play. Cupertino will have yet another dilemma a few years from now and possibly another revolution to foment after this one if they can think of something new. They’ll need it. Still I see happy days ahead for Apple with iOS 7 and the legacy of Steve Jobs preserved for now.
Palm Foleo but with a better phone.
Or an OQO, but with a phone: http://web.archive.org/web/20110725135644/https://www.oqo.com/
Not ‘Foleo’, but ‘Foleo’ done right! As she always do, Apple learned from others mistakes, devised a coherent plan, made the needed investments, and now she is posed to make a difference.
Whatever shape this ‘future desktop’ takes, Wintel is doomed…forever…I can even imagine Wikipedia footnote (…Microsoft attempted to save its empire by creating a nobody-really-care copy of iOS, calling it ‘Windows RT’. It was too little, too late….).
Not likely. Corporate inertia is a sluggish beast, because corporations don’t want to have to pay for a new IT platform every year. They also don’t want their data stolen from them.
But at the same time, they don’t want to be perceived as “not hip”.
My prediction is that this will fracture the corporate environment, where the execs get the pretty iOS toys on an annual basis while the rest of the corporation have to make do with new laptops and whatnot every 3-5 years.
Device spanning is the future
https://www.pcworld.com/article/2049027/device-spanning-ubuntu-touch-os-gets-october-17-launch-date.html
I addressed this about five days ago in response to a post on BoomBustBlog about Intel’s Haswell processor. I was wrong on Apple using Haswell but Microsoft may benefit from it. Here’s what Reggie Middleton wrote about Haswell and MS: http://boombustblog.com/blog/item/9141-intels-haswell-processor-killed-microsofts-windows-rt-before-it-even-grew-legs [there’s a telling chart on Haswell battery life]
And here was part of my response:
“Mac OS and iOS are very close in runtime, programming language, frameworks, toolchain, etc. So, what happens when Apple drops full OS X and iOS functionality into either an iPhone or iPad form factor? I’m a mobile developer so I know a thing or two about this. For an example of the potential utility, see Ubuntu Edge.
Also, what happens if Apple goes into server OS? Their platform uses ARC which unlike garbage collection is very fast and tight.”
What prevents Microsoft from doing the same or better?
Capability?
Inertia and capitalization, One cannot just _Give_Office_Free_ and honestly Pages.App is a far better business WP. just import a word Docx, work it, export it and no-one’s the wiser. I’ve used my share of web apps on a few platforms and iWork-App is noice.
Now add to this a siri-local or even a siri-store and you are at home and _Bloop_ siri:Play “MovieX” and if it ain’t there then siri:Purchase “MovieX”. Now they have infrastructure and a few lovely data centers, the question is can they be trusted with that much user data?
Doesn’t Google want everything to be cloud-based (on their servers)? ChromeOS is what really aligns with their model and objectives. I think the success of Android took them by surprise. For Google it’d be less about a device-in-your-pocket (or pulled from your pocket) that can power a full-size screen, keyboard, mouse, etc., and more about a world of thin clients (back to that idea, again) from which you log in to Google’s services and access all your data, apps, preferences, etc. stored on Google’s servers.
Google, the cloud services company, has much less incentive to promote any kind of local computing than Apple, the hardware company, does.
Tried to edit to finish my thought, but I guess it timed out:
.
“Workstation-class computing power in your pocket” is much more of an Apple goal. Things like ChromeCast, super-cheap, commoditized, and simply a way to access cloud services, are more Google’s style. I expect Google’s long-term vision for hardware is firmly based on ChromeOS: As low-cost as possible and only “just good enough” to run web applications in its built-in Chrome browser.
AHA! but this is the Key. we are thin clients with rich data. I posit that I have >=85% of the editing throughput (for rich media-types) that I had 6 years ago-2008. With good semantic and fetch-predicates a lot of the load can be split between cached-in-edit-mode and cached-on-server mode. BUT parlay that against really swift SSD data centers and the effect becomes a question of questions?
_WHICH_ killer app to do first? Apple has the FATTEST thin-clients EVER!
Chrome’s new push for standalone apps shows they realize the gap those are needed to fill – cannot have Cloud access all the time.
I’m still in the stone age, sitting here with my tin-box wintel desktop. It has a nice 22-inch screen, fast quad-core processor, and a couple of big, fast HDD’s. It does everything I want, quickly.
Bob’s article is fascinating and, no doubt, prescient. But the world he describes and and everyone’s commenting on is fine for a few text documents and e-mail but hopelessly slow for just about anything else. Having to work with even a small number of large image files or HD movies using wifi or, god forbid, a mobile network would put me in my coffin. We seem to be sacrificing a hell of a lot for the sake of the “convenience” of portability.
I think Bob said for situations like you describe there would always be the Mac.
There will still be a Mac (or desktops) for DTP etc, but the vast majority of people don’t actually need that much power.
It used to be said that the computing required to put man on the moon was now in a calculator and the same is true of most people’s work/life computing needs being inside phones now.
To the “everything in the cloud” debate… I think you do need local storage for those times when you don’t have access to the cloud. Admittedly, those times are fewer and fewer these days as we get wi-fi on planes and trains etc… But outages and slow connections do occur. Having access to everything and synching it in the cloud makes a lot of sense, but having limited local access would be a problem (for me at least).
However, I understand that Google aren’t looking at what is possible now but rather what is possible in 5 years etc… Maybe I just don’t have that foresight 🙁
1) it also can link to e-commerce with biometric certification
2) ok….. You choose:
Being able to do really high powered graphics
Or
Regular wordprocessor and spreadsheet and internet surfing
in a nightclub, strip club, 3 star restaurant, back of a limosine, etc.
Frankly, different times… I might choose one or the other.
I think you underestimate the power of the A7. It benchmarks really well. This will probably improve in the iPad 5 which could tolerate a little higher power dissipation. The Internet would be the bottleneck for large files. For editing a media rich presentation an A7 equipped iPad would be fantastic. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a version of Aperture for the next iPad. By the way, Apple released iMovie for iOS well over a year ago. The iPad is far beyond a little text editing.
Good point; the same one that Microsoft has been making about WinRT. But the main point of Dave’s original comment is the sacrifice for “portability”: “using wifi or, god forbid, a mobile network would put me in my coffin. We seem to be sacrificing a hell of a lot for the sake of the “convenience” of portability.” In other words, there is still the problem of trying to do heavy work over cellular or Wi-Fi. And he forgot to mention the limited ram and storage as well.
If Apple were to do that, then pundits would scream “it’s just an iPhone that connects to a monitor! Innovation is dead at Apple!”… Similar to what was said when the iPad came out.
Honestly, I think the next move is a new Apple TV with an A7 and an SDK. It would outperform Sony’s Vita TV and get along with the iPhone you already own better. I see lots of potential in this.
That’s a GREAT product idea.
Unfortunately, it’s been done—it’s called the iPhone 5s. In several weeks third parties will ship controller keypads that it’ll dock with and you’ll have a portable player a LOT more powerful than the Vita. In perhaps another six months or a year, there’ll be a lower-cost iPod version (I predict).
Happy gaming!
Vita TV, not Vita…
Hey I agree,
Some of Apple’s best products are in the Mac range. If they became yet another mobile phone company, they are gone burger. Samsung would love that, and compete head on head and would win hands down. No, Apple should extenuate the positive and forget the negative. iPhone’s for them while incredible sellers yesterday, are not going to be incredible sellers in the future, not without something special. The performance of the device is extraordinary, but not talked about in the press. Instead they touted iPhone 5S as the best mobile device on the market, but really everyone can see that it isn’t.
There is a spoof doing the rounds on YouTube. Its so funny because its so plausible. If you are delivering racing car performance, the physical appearance of the phone should reflect this. Put it all in the same packaging, then people are going to think that it is the same.
Sir Jonathan Ive (known extensively as the designer of all cool Apple devices, in the UK, was knighted last year for his extraordinary contributions). Sir Jonathan, should oust Tim Cook and take over the company. If the Apple board approved this Apple’s continued success would be guaranteed.
“iPhone’s for them while incredible sellers yesterday, are not going to be incredible sellers in the future, not without something special.”
.
The future? Like, over the next few days as the iPhone 5s has its opening weekend?
.
Come back Monday evening and compare “yesterday’s” sales to “the future” of the next few days.
.
Then come back in 3 1/2 months and compare Apple’s coming holiday sales numbers and profit to everyone else’s.
.
As far as Samsung competing with Apple as “yet another mobile phone company,” well, they’re already competing head on in smartphones and Apple’s making more profit from them.
Another possibility for this gizmo of yours is to avoid the heavy (and never large enough) display entirely and take advantage of the fact that every hotel room in the country already supports a standard any modern DVI or TBolt display adapter can talk to: HDMI.
No longer do we need to worry about SVGA or the right cables or tons of crazy adapters. The adapters for IOS to to HDMI are $20, and small (mind you, they’re mostly still 30-pin, but the lightning connectors are probably in stores now). So you just drag out your iphone, plug it in to the TV, blue-tooth on the fold-up keyboard and trackpad, and you can do desktop-like work anywhere but an airport (which will have a shortage of easy-accessible tv sets).
So yeah, a portable small ‘tv’ could be available, but only as a last resort, and it would just be a lightweight monitor that only speaks HDMI, for easy talking to a Mac Mini, MacBook, AppleTV, or your IOS, plus also work with a blu-ray player in a pinch, but if you want more screen space, just plug into the TV as soon as you hit your hotel room.
(one could also look at the $200 HDMI micro-projectors already available in places like Brookstone – just find a wall to point to…)
Do any high-end hotels provide Apple TVs hooked up to the TVs in their rooms? Then there’d be no cables needed.
.
Tons of hotels already have alarm clocks equipped with 30-pin docks. Now that the 30-pin connector is deprecated they’ll probably start looking into AirPlay-equipped devices, as that’s both more “future proof” and backwards compatible to a high enough percentage of 30-pin equipped iOS devices that are still in use. This is just a small step away from going full-on with Apple TVs. The main drawbacks of Apple TVs are the additional steps to pair the devices, and that you’d have to have the TV on just to play music.
.
Lots of hotels use Mac minis to power various entertainment and guest information displays/etc. Some may already use Apple TVs to send the video signals, in particular situations (e.g. like a temporary display in a location that doesn’t already have an HDMI cable routed to it). Their IT departments would then already be familiar with them.
.
I wonder how long it’ll be before this becomes commonplace.
I don’t think they’ll go so far as to have everything-Apple. The IOS iHome alarm clocks were there because they were cheap (iHome probably offered a major volume discount, as it becomes advertising for people to buy one for their home once they like it), and also because for a while, iPhone and the 30 pin was a significant standard. With Android phones a major player, running only on USB cables, I don’t see hotels looking to get into a vendor lockdown that will alienate 50% of the clientel (that said, some hotels already have alarm clocks with both 30pin AND a USB plug, just provide your own cable).
But the TV technology is considerably more expensive, which is why I think the hotel chains aren’t likely to make an investment without a similar volume discount like what the alarm clocks came with.
And looking back to my example, there’s no need: like I said, YOU provide the HDMI adapter (a mere $20) and your phone can already connect. My kid’s iPod Touch can do it (annoyingly, Amazon cloud video doesn’t support it, but IOS video does). With the 64bit chips and uber-responsive apps, there’s no reason, as Bob noted above, that the apps themselves can’t react to having a 1080p screen and use the 1920×1080 accordingly, just like a desktop would. It is more that the apps have no idea that screen space is available yet. Once they realize it will be, they’ll be responsive to that size, too.
I would expect 3rd party AirPlay-equipped speaker alarm clocks (from iHome or otherwise) to be the first step, whenever they’re ready to put in replacements.
.
$99 Apple TV pucks are actually very modest in cost for big hotel chains. And they’re already buying lots of (much more expensive) Mac Minis. High-end/boutique hotels will often have one Mac Mini per room.
.
The customer base of big chains like Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott, etc. are likely to more disproportionally use iOS devices than Android compared to the general population, too.
Joe Shelby: I don’t know about supporting HDMI, but Amazon Prime Instant Video just added AirPlay support in an update. If you have an AppleTV, you’re all set.
In-N-Out Burger and iOS 7. Yum.
In N Out Burger, Bob? You’ll need to adopt a Whole Food Plant Based Diet because we need you around for a long long time. 🙂
Greatness. Thanks Cringely. It is why I keep up with you. But it is kind of like that Burger King commercial and the little girl and fries on the burger – “Hey they stole my idea”……..
We all have thought about this concept, but we do not have the wear with all to make it happen. I hope Apple is truly going in that direction. I would love to see my phone without wearing glasses on a 27” monitor and answer a call at the same time while working on a spreadsheet, hit a button, walk out to the car and continue at home without skipping a beat! Keep us posted. -R
You are GREAT! I love you Bob!! I am sure Steve Jobs is loving you too (form the heavens)… I believe that Tim Cook, after reading this, will love you too or, maybe, hate you (for disclosing his secrets)… You are his Edward Snowden!! LOL
God bless you Bob!
“Remember Lotus? Remember Word Perfect? Remember Borland? ” They all died because Microsoft released Windows and hid some API’s and also had a head-start on the O/S (duh). In other words, it had zero to do with complacency – Bob – you should know better.
All three companies were hurt by Microsoft, true, but they all suffered, too, from terrible management. Lotus and WordPerfect thought they could ignore Windows. Borland stupidly bought Ashton-Tate only to find the code actually belonged to NASA. Microsoft was evil but these companies did a lot to hurt themselves.
The best recent example of a company doomed by complacency is probably Blackberry.
I remember the Osborne Executive (and actually have an Osborne 1 in the basement – anyone want to buy it?).
This is an interesting, and hopeful play, for Apple to make,but it seems so much has to go right for it to work out. And why not make the iphone (or some sort of 64-bit ipod touch) be the guts of whatever desktop or laptop replacement device they invent? Just built the shell, slot in your idevice, and compute. When done, take it home and compute there, while driving home listen to your iTunes while traveling in your iCar.. Surely some future version of the Lightening connector will have the bandwidth to handle all the connectivity needed. And as a wearable computer the idevice can fit in your pocket…
Sounds like the Motorola webtop setup that I’ve had on my Droid Bionic (among others) for years. I drop it into a small dock with the HDMI connection to a big monitor and USB connected mouse and keyboard and away you go. Haven’t tried it, but I thought I had read that blue tooth mice/keyboards work too (no dock required in that case). Not that Apple isn’t going to try this and possibly even succeed with it, but they would certainly not be the first (again).
As the first commenter mentioned, there was the Palm Foleo. Before that the was the OQO, and UMPCs.
.
Hey look, Samsung has a smartwatch before Apple! (“We’re first!”) Uh, yeah, that’s nice…
.
People keep forgetting it’s not the idea, it’s the execution.
“yet another product class that Apple will dominate for awhile then eventually lose”
.
Examples?
.
Apple II (and ///) losing to PC clones in the early ’80’s, sure.
.
The Mac was never dominant, at least in market share. It’s dominating NOW, in profit share, though. 🙂
.
Is “graphical computing” a distinct product class from just “computing”? If so, ok, maybe the Mac had and then lost the majority share of “graphical computing PCs” to Windows. I’d say that’s more of a sub-class, though. And again, Apple is now dominant in profit share in that area.
.
The iPod rose to dominance in portable media players and has never lost it.
.
The iTunes Music Store continually faced down contenders, and continues to dominate.
.
iTunes video services were never dominant.
.
The iPhone was never dominant in market share. Yet again, though, in profit share it became dominant, and continues to be so. It also continues to gain market share faster over Android in the U.S. It dominates in Japan, and with the NTT Docomo deal it’s sure to continue to do so.
.
The iPad is still dominant in tablet computers.
.
Is Apple “losing” or “soon to lose” dominance in any of the few areas that it can actually claim dominance? Conjecture on that is pure speculation, and an invalid basis for the original argument.
I think Lotus and Borlund went belly up because they stopped innovating and started suing.
Google is already out in front of this curve, but their take is that the device is irrelevant; you don’t even need a phone in your pocket. With the new packaged apps that run on any platform so long as Chrome is installed, and with a free office suite on all platforms, the Google train has already left the station and is picking up momentum daily.
Today’s release of Quickoffice for Android for free and Quickoffice’s being rolled out in Chrome OS for free is a good example of the convergence that will make hardware in large part moot. Apple’s making iWork available for free is a forced response to what Google is doing, and of course with both Apple and Google making their office suites available for free, Microsoft is going to be left in an untenable position.
Greenspun in ’05: http://philip.greenspun.com/business/mobile-phone-as-home-computer
fantastic. Any theory on how Apple will address the problem of editing office documents like spreadsheet and presentations? Those experiences are currently horrible on a tablet or phone.
Why is editing documents horrible? I have a bluetooth keyboard that seems to work very well. I edit Word documents on my iPad all the time. I’m missing the horrible part. The fact that I have to touch the iPad’s screen to select text? I can still use the keyboard for that. I must be missing something.
It’s OK on a tablet, not so good on a phone.
Try editing a presentation with a keyboard and a tiny screen…
The one market segment that is still wintel and hates the apple closed hardware/design are the PC Gamers, they hate Apple OS as its too restricting and do insane things to get an edge, upgrading video cards, cooling, memory, monitors etc…
This is not possible in the apple world
Most serious gamers that i know wont run bootcamp or parallels as they may lose a millisecond edge over their opponents.
What’s the size of that market segment, as a percentage of total PC sales? I suspect it’s not big enough that Apple would ever care about not addressing it. And personal computers as a percentage of Apple’s total sales are going down over time anyway.
Apparently Apple is now targeting the biggest problem for serious gaming on iOs devices: https://www.slidetoplay.com/news/apple-supported-ios-controllers-are-coming/
You are talking about a netbook running iOS but without a processor. How much money does leaving out an ARM processor really save? Is that really worth leaving out? I think most people would rather have a netbook that will still work if they lose their phone or if they are talking on their phone.
So… something like: http://androidandme.com/2012/04/news/motorola-is-turning-android-into-a-desktop-os-with-webtop-3-0/ … only without the dock?
An iphone wirelessly driving a big monitor, keyboard and mouse? Of course, that will NEVER work without wireless printing! Oh, wait…
Maybe Apple will call it the iLapdock – i.e. the Motorola Lapdock for the Moto Atrix/Bionic/etc Androids done Apple style (and successfully in contrast with Motorola). I like my Lapdock well enough for light big-screen use of my Bionic, but for my usual style of multiple windows as I multitask along, its single app at a time on the screen is just too restrictive no matter how big – a 20+-inch TV/monitor would just annoy me no end with all that wastage on a single app when I could be looking at several windows.
When it comes to job computer use (Bob’s seeming target scenario), my 2 big monitors (1600×1200, 1920×1050) are still not enough at times when I have to open Outlook emails, IM chats, Softphone, Task Manager, Program links folder, server monitors, and usually at least a dozen Solaris xterm sessions, several web browsers, and the occasional Word documents and/or spreadsheets. For multi-tasking like that, fuggedaboudit.
Another issue starting to come out with BYOD and office-in-a-pocket devices is that they are becoming huge security and support concerns. More businesses are finding that BYOD is not an employee enabler so much as huge vulnerability, and that it requires major investment in management tools and complete software migrations from the tried/true Windows fat client on cheap hardware model. Also, employees are starting to catch on to the other side of that coin: it is a new form of ball-and-chain to anchor them to work any place and any time, and it is not theirs any more with remote wipe tools for the corporate command center to activate “at need”.
I have decided with my own Android phone to keep it at a remove from that much tethering – it gets alerts from servers I manage via text messages, and I can use Office Web Access (OWA) to read emails and chat – I decided using NitroDesk Touchdown as an Exchange client was just a bit too intrusive, and I have to take along the company’s notebook for my terminal sessions anyway when I am on-call since they have drawn the line (so far, mostly) at allowing full VPN access into servers from mobile devices. I used to yearn for the pocketable (or belt holster-able) all-in-one device to let me do it all on the go, but having had a taste of it, I find it rather bitter and choking.
For the management and marketing extrovert types that are “mobile” (even if only from office to office), and just doing chats, emails, video conferencing, etc, and putting in face time with colleagues/customers, Bob’s use case for the iLapdock form factor might make sense. But I don’t see it being well-suited to clerical workers in cubicles who use company workstations for their web docs, email, chats, MS Office docs, and task-specific custom Java or VisualBasic business apps all day, and want to leave it all at the office when they go home, nor for the techies like me who need wall-to-wall terminal sessions on top of that.
I really think Bob’s “vision” is of a niche – maybe large, but not pervasive for the vast majority of workers. Apple may be able to sell a few milllion iLapdocks into that niche, but I do not see how they can displace much of the MS Office/biz apps/tech support ecosystem. It could well be a supplement for a large-ish subset of that latter group, but not a complete infrastructure replacement.
[…] The Secret of iOS 7 Source: https://www.cringely.com/2013/09/19/the-secret-of-ios-7/ 0 […]
It would be wonderful to have a simple display and keyboard that would communicate over my wifi network to one of the Mac desktops I have in my home.
I bought my wife an iPad after her Macbook Pro broke as a device to communicate with her desktop Mini because she’s disabled and needs to run her stuff from bed. iPad + iOS = too different from OS X. If only I could buy her a thing that is about the size of her Macbook Pro but is just a monitor and keyboard + wifi that would talk to her Mini. Problem would be solved.
Haven’t seen such a product. Kickstarter?
Check on appstore VNC apps
We are very close to a paradigm shift in home computing. Imagine a “server” that has no monitor or keyboard, and can be kept in a closet or in a cabinet out of sight. One can access it and do work with it from a terminal (keyboard/monitor) from one’s desk, from a tablet in one’s home, or from a mobile device outside of one’s home. While there are VNC apps on the market, someone like Google, Microsoft, or Apple could make a really high quality product and service.
..
If Microsoft could get their head out of the ground they’d realize this could be an important future direction for their company. Of course they’d have to support Android and IOS mobile devices too. The heart of Microsoft’s market position (monopoly) is MICROSOFT OFFICE. It is not Windows. With Google and Apple offering ‘office’ tools for their platforms it is only a matter of time until they begin to take a bite out of Microsoft’s cash cow.
A few years ago Microsoft came up with “Windows Home Server” which wasn’t very popular compared to cheaper things like NAS boxes or plain home networking that works peer to peer. Microsoft’s answer to the iPad is Windows RT type devices, like Surface RT or Surface 2, which can join the network as any other PC. But you make a good point that running actual programs on a computer remotely is uncommon. Unfortunately, it looks like Microsoft and Apple (even Amazon) want to run the programs for you on their cloud servers, so they can charge for a “service”. A few columns ago Bob Cringely wrote about the problems he was having using thin clients to access a local server but he never gave us a step-by-step explanation of how to set one up. My “solution” has been to use a dockable umpc so I can carry my desktop in my pocket. Most people just use laptops, which can also be used with bigger i/o devices.
Unfortunuately, you are completely out of your mind.
One small (or huge in the case of iOS7) misstep, and Apple will lose the upper hand on carriers and be relegated to carrier certification (based on dropping iphone sales).
Apple trying to turn a Microsoft on microsoft is laughable.
As soon as Apple goes enterprise as they do appear to be doing, they will (and I mean in 6 months) completely lose the consumer sector and their devices will look good only maybe at radio shack.
The apple store might even strt to look like a radio shack.
Your way off man. Its true, iOS 7 is the end of the iPhone and the iPad.
They told you not to take the brown acid, bob, but you did anyway, right?
Wake up and smell the coffee. You are just another blind Apple fanboy, not open for real facts.
There are no “real facts” in bob’s fantasy.
*slow clap* Great insight. No really. Way to add to the discussion.
Ubuntu Edge.
This is what Ubuntu has been advertising since a long time now (https://www.ubuntu.com/phone/ubuntu-for-android) and even was getting millions from the market ready to invest.
The time for desktop and, I would say, portable computers, is now gone. Ironically the only device that brought a workstation-class operating system on the move is Surface, whereas other on-the-move devices still run stripped down OSes.
Great column, Bob!
I hope you’re wrong, but I think you’re right….
This is exactly the future that I want. For a long time it has been obvious that there is no ‘right’ size for a phone or computer screen. I want a phone in my pocket so it has a 4″ screen. I need to carry a laptop so it has a13″ screen. I want as big as possible on the desk so I have dual 24″ monitors (which won’t go in my bag).
I want my computing to connect to the nearest available screen. I want some but not all of my storage to be local as not everywhere is perfectly connected yet. Whatever data I have I want it backed up, replicated, guaranteed indestructible in the event of another K2 extinction even.
The fact that I am not the only one convinced that this is the future gives me great hope that it will come to be. I would like the ability to buy Apple products to make it come true, because I like them. If it happens to be Android or Ubuntu, I suppose that will do. If Microsoft are the only ones to provide a viable solution, I will grit my teeth and give them my money (something I haven’t needed to since Windows XP came out).
I was really worried in that last couple of years that “the desktop is dead” and “mobile is king” because I do more with computers than watch kittens fall off keyboards, which was all I thought tablets were good for. And the idea that I need a HD display on a phone to watch HDTV on a 4″ screen is ridiculous.
Bring on the future!
Don’t forget Bob, that OS X Mavericks has the ability to use airplay and Apple TV for a wireless second display instead of just mirroring like it does today. Maybe this is part of easing the transition and an incentive to get an Apple TV on your desk in the first place.
Is there a bluetooth mouse attached to the setup we see in the image?
I don’t think so Bob. I don’t care how powerful phones get – HD video editors are not going to be doing any serious video editing on a phone with an external monitor. It’s going to be a loooooooong time until iPhones have 64GB of RAM and 200TB storage on them.
Apple is clearly grasping now. The decline has already begun and Apple will go into a stall. Probably a long one, but one nonetheless. When I look at Cook, Ive, and Federeghi or whatever his name is I see 3 reasonably smart people who, despite having seen Apple through some great times, just don’t get it. Steve GOT IT. These three don’t. Without direction, Apple is rudderless. The only person I could imagine running Apple today would be Elon Musk and he’s busy. I don’t think anyone out there has both the design sense AND the drive AND the business insight to keep Apple at its peak. The decline will be slow and long since Apple is so huge with so much momentum, but it has already begun. Nothing can stop that now.
Wakjob,
You name is appropriate. This is Apple’s new, um, golden era. They’re serving both technology and fashion. Nothing wrong with that. I think the trio at the top is executing on Steve’s plan very well.
I think it’s interesting that so many people act as if Steve Jobs suddenly died in a car accident. In fact, he knew the end was coming for quite a long time. He had years to select and train his team, and to formulate Apple’s plans for the future. (What I wouldn’t give for a look at that Top Secret document!) If Apple stumbles because of the lack of Steve Jobs, it won’t happen for quite a while.
I think the users expectations are easily met on handheld devices because we have little to compare with. However, as soon as people sit down by their screen and keyboard (and we will for decades to come) any device has to meet the expectations of the desktop platform. The iPhone then suddenly has to not only show a notetaking application with cloud storage, it now had to present an office compatible word processor. It’s easy to dismiss the hardware requirements for desktop work as being “light”, but nothing is further from the truth. The cheap ultra fast desktop CPU:s of recent years have meant that ordinary applications such as web browsers and word processors have become quite heavy. I don’t see a proper desktop experience using less than 20W continuously today, and maybe 2-5xthat for heavier work such as photoshop or other compute heavy tasks. This generation of phones won’t catch up with the “desktop experience”, because that experience is still evolving with high power desktop CPUs. In 2-3 generations phones may catch up, primarily because the moving target that is desktop will slow down as it becomes more and more marginal.
An interesting point is Apple is more like a consumer product company. The rules of tech industry have their effects on Apple. However, while completing in the consumer market, there are other rules as well. Taking different dimensions in to account could not be a bad idea.
[…] X. Cringely speculates that apple is aiming to replace the desktop with iDevices plugged into monitors with keyboard and […]
“iWork is now free on all new iOS devices.”
Because it’s useless on touchscreens.
Haven’t Microsoft _already_ being pursuing the same strategy for the last 3 years?
Didn’t Motorola already do this with their earlier Android phones? They (moto) even went so far as to offer a dock that had a built in screen and keyboard to turn your phone into a Laptop. Thing is, there isn’t that much demand for such a device now because they aren’t enterprise class and neither is the iPhone 5s.
A lack of memory and an interface based around touching and swiping would make iOS desktop apps face the same problems as their Windows 8 cousins – what works beautifully on a 3″ wide screen doesn’t work well on a 25″ monitor and vice versa. It’s somewhat easier to drop a 64bit processor into a smartphone than it is to rewrite the useful Mac apps to (i) run on iOS and (ii) scale from a 4″ touchscreen to a 28″ monitor/keyboard/mouse setup.
Rather than being some kind of masterstoke of strategy, this is simply an attempt to catch up with Microsoft’s own flawed plans.
I have noticed many tech articles that seem to have this pro Apple bias. Other companies are criticized for trying to use mobile optimized infrastructure to power the desktop, but it’s grand strategy if Apple pursues it.
That’s because Apple actually has the mobile user base and hardware, and the desktop hardware and OS. So making them converge is less of a leap of wishful thinking, and more of the next step in the plan.
Apps! Don’t ever ignore apps!
.
Since the Mac is required for running Xcode the Mac is safe. They’ll have to provide *something* to allow developers to create on this. It’s part of what feeds the mobile industry and to cut it would seriously harm mobile; and not in a good way either.
.
Power users. They’ll buy the expensive Mac desktop. Revenue may be low, but profit margin is high.
.
And having people sitting in coffee shops bent over their MacBook Pro with the logo glownig is a huge advert for Apple all around the world. Hard to ignore.
.
Desktop / Notebook computing may only be responsible for 15% of their income but it is significant. And worth much more to Apple than 15% of their income!
And if I don’t want to be locked into Apple? Am I just destined to be stuck with Windows or hacking together Linux installs on whatever hardware I can find? I would *hate* to have to use an iOS based desktop….
This sounds a lot like a wireless version of the Motola Lapdock for the Atrix 4G, but bluetooth wireless. If so, it fits in with Apples’ technology history of they didn’t invent it, but they will get it right…
[…] Programming News: The Secret of iOS 7 The Innovator’s Dilemma, a 1997 book by Harvard professor Clayton Christensen, made the point that successful companies can lose their way when they pay too much attention to legacy products and not enough attention to new stuff. They are making so much money they either don’t see a competitor rising up or are too complacent to feel threatened. In either case the incumbent generally loses and the upstart (usually one of many) generally wins. The best way for successful companies to avoid this problem is by inventing the future before their competitors do. We see this pattern over and over in high tech. Remember Lotus? Remember Word Perfect? Remember Borland? And it’s not just in software. Remember IBM sticking too long with the 80286 processor? Remember the Osbourne Executive? Microsoft certainly faces this dilemma today, having nothing with which to replace Windows and Office. Some say Apple, too, is living now on the wrong side of the innovation curve, but I don’t think so. I think Cupertino has a plan. Read full story => Cringely […]
Bob,
Another market buster: M7 – i.e. Motion Controller – can you say “Kinect – Apple Style” for your beefed up AppleTV? Think “fully” interactive 3-D TV. Want to play fantasy football/hockey/baseball with friends? No Problemo! Want to be the soldier in Infinity Blade? You betcha! Fully interactive, networked connected, and it’s “game on” – Gee, maybe even a full fledged Holodeck??? Now THAT would be the cat’s meow. . . .
Apple will probably do 3-D TV MUCH better than Samsung every could. . . . Yes, “it’s the software stupid”. Though the Linux/Andriod fans will howl loudly, get real. . . Sure 64-bit Linux exists, FOR X86, NOT ARM, at least for “real” purposes (eval systems don’t really count). The Spectre of Steve Jobs lives on. . .
Very interesting speculation Bob. Do you have any references for the Bluetooth mouse support in iOS 7? This is the first I’ve heard of it and I’m and iOS developer.
The one thing that sounds a bit off base to me is the idea of the MacBook Vacuum. I can’t see Apple making a device in that form that can’t function on its own as a standalone device. I could see them do something like this running iOS 7 with an A7 inside. Data would be easily shared with the user’s iPhone using AirDrop. I could also see this with the *ability* to function as a remote display and input device for iPhone (I just can’t see it *only* functioning in this mode).
The puzzle for me is how they allow it to function well as a large iPad and at the same time allow it to be used in the laptop form without it being a “refrigerator toaster”.
If you’re right that Apple is about to attack what remains of the PC market in this way they will have taken the important step of continuing to find new ways to deliver value to their customer base in the post-Steve era (and expand it in the process). This is part of what I believe they need to do to build some confidence in the investment community that their business is not about to evaporate like that of Nokia, RIM, etc. Readers interested in more thoughts about how Apple can build more trust with investors might be interested in my new series “Unlocking the Value in AAPL”:
http://anandabits.com/blog/unlocking-the-value-in-aapl-1/
“So I expect Apple to build for road warriors a new class of devices that have the display, keyboard and trackpad of a notebook but without the CPU, memory or storage. Call it a MacBook Vacuum, because it’s a MacBook Air without the air.”
The idea sounds very similar to the “CalmBook”. But after a year they do not seem to have the actual product for sale.
http://clamcase.com/clambook-android-and-iphone-laptop-dock.html
Via http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/12/06/11/0637238
Sounds like what Microsoft has in mind for Windows RT, which has the added benefit of running Office.
Bob, I think you are RIGHT ON with this. The only place I disagree is the mention of “your desk at work”. Apple doesn’t care about the pro market or the office/corporate market — they gave that up a decade ago. They’re happy to play along with BYOD but they don’t actually care.
What you’re describing is definitely the future for home computing though. How many people only use their iPads at home anyway? If they could wirelessly “dock” it to get a desktop experience without the PC, I think they’ll go there in droves. Combine Apple’s “cool” factor with “you already own it” with Windows 8’s implosion with the overwhelming dominance of malware these days, there’s just no reason most people should buy a PC any more. Most kids play games on consoles, so if the iPad/iPhone could link with bluetooth game controllers, there’d hardly be a reason to buy an XBox.
Pro users, PC gamers and businesses will continue to buy PCs. Inertia will carry desktop and laptop sales forward for a while as well. But you’re absolutely right — the future is mobile. iOS 7 is the first step towards making the mobile platform easier to read (real screens) and easier to use (keyboards/mice).
Nice article!
1. – This is clearly what Mark Shuttleworth at Canonical/Ubuntu had in mind for his Kickstarter-funded effort for a new smartphone. That didn’t reach its funding goal, but he’ll be back.
2. – Yes, the Bluetooth enabled mouse is a critical part of this scenario.
3. – I’m surprised you didn’t focus on the fingerprint reader of the iPhone 5S – I suspect this might prove to be the breakthrough element for your scenario.
This is already happening, but in a slightly different way. I have a friend who recently moved, and doesn’t yet have (or want to pay for) a home Internet connection. So she is currently stuck with driving her laptop to various hotspots in order to surf and read email.
Her daughter’s fiance suggested one possible solution: upgrade her iPhone so she can connect the laptop to the Net THROUGH THE PHONE. Sounds pretty good to me.
Much as I found Cringely’s post inspiring, after reading all the comments above, I think this may be a more practical approach. So what if the new 5S has a “workstation-class 64-bit processor”? How long until it also has workstation-class memory and mass storage? More importantly, When will it ever be able to consume workstation-class watts?
Imagine an iPhone turning cherry red and burning a hole through the furniture! I think the “MacBook Vacuum” better have a bit more silicon onboard than Robert X. proposes…
(pardon the “-” between paragraphs but otherwise for some reason it doesn’t display correctly with just a couple returns, even with spaces in the intervening line)
–
I think this is obviously a big direction for Apple, in general, but it requires a few things I’m not sure they’re ready to face.
–
First, they have to accept a heterogeneous environment – they have to “trust” the TV screen/other screen device. They have to accept others’ keyboards – and ensure those work well (that’s the hard part). They might, but it’s against their DNA and it also introduces grave risks to what makes Apple attractive, that walled garden, curated environment. Or perhaps they’ll attempt to shove TVs and keyboards down our throats, but that will necessarily limit their market rather significantly (which might be acceptable to them, and is no bad thing).
–
Second, they’re not ahead of the game. That means they already are at high risk. It’s unclear if they will stick with being head-to-head or even behind others in a market space, whether they want to commit to a war where they aren’t in a clearly superior starting position.
–
Third, and by no means least, if they really want to go after content creation, where in theory they might get ahead/might already be ahead but we don’t know it, the ergonomics are a bigger challenge. Moving from a desktop to laptop is already an ergonomic challenge, one increasingly questioned in terms of long-term impact. Another step to a distant large screen, a keyboard balance d”somewhere,” no effective touch screen unless you’re going to walk up to the screen or somehow manipulate the (tiny) CPU’s screen (i.e., the iPhone/successor device), and simply the question of mobility (unless they will, as I would hope, embrace virtualization/holographics of sorts for both keyboard and screen) are big. Here they have the best chance, given their design background, but having struggled to use the iPhone (any smartphone) comfortably, I doubt it. Something like Google Glass may be the way to go, for not only mobility but comfortable viewing while working, and here Apple fans and insiders alike can only hope Apple’s aversion to smart eyewear is simply a public pose and not a continuation of Jobs’ “not invented here, so it’s no good” mentality.
–
And that last sentence wraps us around nicely for the probable need for Apple to get more open yet maintain quality. A tough challenge for ANY tech company.
–
In the end, the biggest problem is I see we all know this is where tech is going, and so far there’s no obvious vision from Apple that they yet know how to make it all work. Until they do – or someone else does sooner – all bets are off, I’d say, on whether this strategy “matters” for them aside from the fact it simply keeps them in the mainstream of where we envision tech going.
–
After all, the iPhone was something we were striving for over a long period. They nailed it, and perhaps they will again. But they didn’t nail it because they invented the idea or had any great vision as to the OVERALL direction. Instead it was because they focused on just what it would take to make that vision start to actually work, and, after years of their own (Newton) and many, many others’ failures, they finally got it. Heck, they didn’t even understand (understandably) the importance of apps at first, Jobs thinking the mobile web could provide what was truly needed; in this case we saw Jobs’ agility of mind and lazer focus as he realized his own mistake and quickly reversed direction to highly encourage the broad development of apps (again, nothing conceptually new – Palm had an app store and many 3rd party apps – but done right at the right time).
Bob, do you believe that software developers are always going to be willing to sacrifice a percentage of each sale to either Apple or Google or Microsoft forever? That might work for tiny startups selling novelty apps for 99 cents, but do you think serious software developers are going to eat a loss on every sale? The Apple tax is getting old fast.
With full respect to the nay sayers here Bob, I believe you are EXACTLY correct. For most business users in marketing and sales type roles, (many of whom already have iPhones), this will be where everyone wants to go…Desks and conference rooms with bluetooth connectivity. The next element (demonstrated in Blackberry’s ill-fated Z10 release), is the idea of a partitioned phone: Business-side gets robust policy, locked down features, encrypted storage and admin remote-wipe. The Personal-side gets apps and media. Co-mingled only in views of calendaring, email and contacts.
What about making the phone a watch ? . . . . oh oh
Very interesting article but leaves me with some questions. I was working recently as a contractor in a medium sized company packaging software. They had a core application built to run on Windows. When I say core I mean if it doesn’t run the entire enterprise collapses. They wouldn’t let me package it so the people they had doing it couldn’t get the DLLs to update properly so they gave up and installed like 12 heavy duty Citrix servers and from then on everyone who used the software just used a Citrix session. Now what I know about iOS7 you could put in your eye and wouldn’t notice, but does iOS7 have a Citrix client? Also how good would this phone in your pocket handle running an emulator for all the other programs out there designed in house that are used by Fortune 500 companies right now? Sure people can transition to another platform but that doesn’t automaicaly replace all those computers in cube town the next upgrade cycle? I also think what I have described lets Google out of this equation entirely as a platform. I also have a basic doubt that any platform that puts us back to in essence a mainframe environment stands a chance? Having cloud services of all kinds yes but relying completely on running everything in the cloud and ignoring all the computing potential of all those devices with processors in them, no.
Hmmm…
An 8-hour work day with your iPhone grinding away in your coat pocket the whole time.
Battery good for 8-hours heavy workload plus additional hours commuting and eating out?
Thermal dissipation in a coat pocket?
How about we just assume that there will be a dock on your desktop?
Not to mention that many buildings have poor cell signal, and many companies’ IT folks would never allow wifi or wireless connections into their network.
Dock. Not pocket. Right?
Spot on speculation, Bob. The “win at first, then lose” point is apt, especially in the Clayton Christensen “innovator’s dilemma” concept. Innovation becomes profitable, ubiquitous, and then a low end commodity where cost cutting and efficiency make it very cheap. The world gets changed in the process.
[…] Much more in the full article here. […]
It’s official, the personal computing ecosystem is now so big that even insightful Bob can’t keep track of everything that’s going on. If I recall my iOS apps terms of service correctly (it’s been awhile), Apple still prohibits any app that might allow anything like *code* processors: No Python IDE, no Java, absolutely no C++, Lisp, or Fortran, and no Eclipse or emacs. So OSx will stay around forever as the developer platform, and will keep the quality of iOS apps up because only serious developers will want to invest in the absurd round Mac Pro.
Meanwhile, lots of phones already have HDMI out for a big screen, and HP has an Android desktop PC already, the Slate21 complete with keyboard and mouse. And it’s not dependent on the phone in your pocket because all your stuff is in the cloud in Dropbox, Google Apps or Office 365 and EverNote, etc .A vision of a product that Apple hasn’t even rumored yet – Genius! A shipping product from some other company with the exact same concept but not iOS – Ho hum; Fail…
Apple has shown the world that a good ecosystem plus fantastic integration of hardware and software design plus huge amounts of marketing will beat a good ecosystem and mediocre design plus huge amounts of marketing (Samsung) which will beat a good ecosystem plus great industrial design and average software and poor marketing (Sony). As long as they can keep firing on all cylinders, they’ll keep winning. But if they slip on any part of their combination, (iOS 7?) they’re in deep trouble, because when you’re on top, the only way to go is down, and it’s you against the world.
[…] ← The Secret of iOS 7 […]
Inevitable as the Apple II gave way to the Mac.
You can see it all over what Apple’s doing.
Plug in your ‘motherbox’ anywhere…anytime that’s martini. Apple could just sell a ‘dumb’ display that any iOS tab’ or iPhone will play with. Coupled with wireless k/b and mouse?
At the rate the A7 chip (already, as Gruber puts it, ‘A Macbook Pro from five years ago in your ******* pocket…) is progressing, games, word processing, standard image making and video processing will be more than capable on an A7, A8, A9… Games are already near indistinguishable from The PS3 on the new A7.
It could well eat the ‘low end’ of Apple’s Mac business at least eg Mini.
Wirelessly ‘Plug’ your ‘motherbox’ into your big screen tv…your desktop monitor…your laptop monitor… Your content anywhere…always with you.
The Mac’s got a good few years left in it yet though…
Bob’s ‘desktop’ is a bit ugly though.
Just get yourself an iMac? 😉
Lemon Bon Bon.
How long before the A7, A8, A9 chase down an i7? (Given it’s already eclipsed the Power Mac from 2001…and Core Duos from only a few years ago? If it keeps double over the next couple of years…you have a formidable CPU/GPU in the A9…hard to think of something 4 times as fast as an A7…)
🙂
Lemon Bon Bon.
A few years ago Apple gave us a peek at what could be the fate of the iMac.
http://thedigitalprofessor.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/the-imac-im-still-waiting-for/
The real problem here is that iOS is a toy operating system. It’s fine for surfing or looking at pictures from Aunt Martha, but often at work I am asked to proofread presentations or documents. It would be nigh on impossible to do that with one freaking window open. I need to look at the document while I compose my reply. How am I going to do that with iOS? Print the thing out first (shudder)?
–
It’s not just me being an old fart, either. When I go to a coffee shop, all the college students there are not poking at tablets, they’re bangin away on laptops. Why? They’re trying to get real work done.
–
And what happens when I get a phone call? Does the big screen suddenly switch to the phone app? That’s useless, because I often need to refer to my computer when I’m talking on the phone to someone at work.
–
No, the single-window paradigm is too early 90’s to be useful at work. Welcome back, Windows 1.0.
That would turn out to be wrong. iOS is not any sort of toy OS. It’s a very serious OS with a tablet-appropriate UI that a lot of people mistake for a toy. There’s full unixy goodness under there. Take a look at how many processes are running under the covers sometime. Just because a single-window-at-a-time UI is apple’s choice of UIparadigm for their small screen tablets and phones right now, don’t imagine that it will be the choice for larger screens or in the future.
Can a multi-window UI be made for small screen tablets? Sure! Been there done that, twenty-five years ago. Would it work well for as many people as use iOS? Dunno. Could Apple make a UI that works well for bigger screens? Duh.
Granted, if Apple can manage to seamlessly and simultaneously integrate the large screen/WIMP view with the small screen/single-window view, then maybe they have a chance of taking over the enterprise desktop. But Bob was talking like iOS7 is basically ready to do that without mentioning the obvious single-window roadblock. It certainly seems like a better way for MS to have gone with Win8 rather than the loogie they managed to hork up.
–
And yes, maybe saying that iOS has a toy UI that is not ready for getting real work done rather than saying it is a toy OS would have been a better way for me to make my point.
New feature in iOS 7 is the ability to enable apps to continuously update even while not in use. I agree that multiple windows are a deal-breaker on a larger display, seems like Apple might be moving in that direction.
Oh, and referring back to the marking up docs point – there are a number of PDF markup app in the App Store, including the Skitch adjunct to Evernote. I won’t vouch for any of them since I don’t need that capability right now.
And when the phone rings you can return to the app you were using (or any other) without losing the call (well, assuming your telco support voice and data simultaneously).
Don’t get me wrong by the way – I much prefer multiple windows open at the same time – I’ve been a dyed in the wool user of that idiom since I started using Smalltalk in 1983.
My first Mac (around 1985) had a small screen, no multi-tasking and multiple windows. Of course, we didn’t expect movement in all the windows back then on that 16-bit, 1 MHz single-core processor with 512 KB of RAM and 10 MB of hard disk.
That was 30 years ago. There is nothing stopping Apple from doing multiple windows, multi-tasking (of sorts) with a 64-bit, 1.3 GHz dual-core processor with around 1 GB of RAM and 16 GB of flash “disk”. Let’s just call it 1000x and more.
It was their choice, I suspect, to use a single window to make it easy for people to learn and use a smart phone. It still works for the tablet or most any situation where you are mostly consuming content. (We can’t read or watch two things at once very well.)
Once you give them a keyboard and mouse and the capability to easily create such content, it becomes important to be able to consult other content while creating. You need multiple windows for that along with a bit more screen real estate.
Shouldn’t be hard if Apple decides to do it.
I think it’s true that multiple windows can be done; it has been done for years in OSX and Windows. But the newer app model for iOS and Windows RT has better security as one primary goal. Apparently multiple windows has been a security problem with the traditional desktop. No doubt it can be done; Windows 8.1 includes more side by side views than Windows 8 (for the RT stuff). As a side note, I’d like to point out that full Windows 8, thanks to Stardock, can be made to run just like Windows 7 with their “Start8”, and you can run all the RT apps you want in whatever size windows you want with their “ModernMix”. But this article is about the evolution of the new app model to the point where it can make legacy OSX or Windows programs obsolete. In the mean time, Windows users can use a single relatively complex x86 device, while Apple users must use two devices, one for OSX and one for iOS.
Here’s one reason why Windows/Office on business desktops is here to stay. The inclusion of Microsoft Access in Office has led to the creation of many mission-critical database apps within many enterprises, and the cost of either abandoning or porting these applications will be preposterous. Of course, I say this as a programmer/consultant who mostly develops in Access (since that’s what clients have ‘for free’). I understand what Bob is saying about the Rest of the World, and his vision for this new paradigm is compellingly possible. Still, I have clients that will be running Access apps under Windows until Cupertino freezes over.
That’s remarkably like SAP. Once you get it in your corporation, you’re stuck with it forever.
[…] Gang Mentality: Will Apple make an “iSomething”, essentially sort of a Chromebook…sort of a thin client….but likely an everything’s-in-the-cloud device? Robert X. Cringely sure thinks so: The Secret of iOS 7 […]
Unrelated to this article but in regards to but applies to past articles:
http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/education/the-stem-crisis-is-a-myth
Bill Gates chose his words carefully: “U.S. companies face a severe shortfall of scientists and engineers with expertise to develop the next generation of breakthroughs.” chairman of Microsoft, 2008. But the article has many more common sense observations. For example, the country as a whole will benefit from a populace able to think with the advantage of stem knowledge. I’ve often thought it odd that many people who would clearly see through and avoid the Nigerian Prince scam, would still buy lottery tickets.
A college friend of mine used to say that lotteries were “a tax for people who can’t do math”.
While he is no doubt correct, I also suspect that part of the reason why people play the lottery is the lure of finally hitting that big one and not having to labor under the persistent threat of layoffs.
The lure will be gone after extending the math knowledge with probability theory.
I’ve believed this vision for years. Not necessarily just from apple. We’d carry our computers and just need larger screens and wireless connectivity to peripherals. It will happen. I do recall getting my first iPhone in 2007 and saying to everyone I showed it to…..all they need to do is make a shell of a laptop and you dock the phone. The screen becomes the touchpad and now I have cpu, gfx, a larger screen, and connectivity.
[…] See on http://www.cringely.com […]
My concept for the next Apple TV includes a socket to dock my iPhone to connect faster than wifi and recharge its battery, another processor with memory etc that will allow multiple windows and concurrent applications, at least two HDMI ports for multiple displays, a port for a local hard drive connection, capable of running IOS-x and apps on its own without the phone. Bluetooth Touch pad and keyboard optional, or keep the phone in hand using wifi for input.
It can still be black, and yeah, sure, they won’t allow the hard drive connection to compete with iCloud, but why not all the rest?
[…] I, Cringely The Secret of iOS 7 – I, Cringely – ik zag hem via meerdere kanalen binnenkomen, dit intrigerende artikel over de toekomst van de desktop en de rol die iOS7 hier in speelt. Lezenswaardig! “I expect Apple to build for road warriors a new class of devices that have the display, keyboard and trackpad of a notebook but without the CPU, memory or storage. Call it a MacBook Vacuum, because it’s a MacBook Air without the air.” […]
Often I use my Galaxy to call up my virtual desktop and display it on conference room monitors. It’s not a complete desktop replacement but getting closer.
What about the upcoming Mac Pro? Seems to contradict, or at least weaken your argument about Apple’s strategy, as it’s a pretty solid new desktop. Interesting that no one else has mentioned it in the comments.
Microsoft and Apple have the same strategy: in the short term support the x86 desktops as long as necessary, but in the long term, as apps and internet connectivity get better, move as much processing to the cloud as possible so they can charge for it every month. Computing will become service, instead of device, centric.
And while I’m sure that’s the future, Ronc, all I can think of is how hackers must be salivating at that prospect.
Bob, this post was very interesting. As you probably already know, ASUS already has what they call a “PadFone” which is close to what you’re talking about…except your concept of course is mostly wireless. The PadFone like the older/recent Motorola Atrix requires the phone to be docked. I actually thought about this whole concept shortly after the iPhone came out….having a “superphone” that could plug into “dumb” peripherals but it’s definitely taken a while for the technology to shrink and get fast enough.
I agree, the one huge advantage Apple has is presence. Their footprint is so huge and reputation so high that even though other companies have basically already done it…when Apple chooses to do it, because of their status, it will suddenly be as if they are the first ones to do it…right at least. A lot of power Apple has. How long they can hold onto it will be interesting to see. I don’t think they will be dominant in 20 years but I might be wrong. It will be interesting to watch : )
[…] The secret of iOS7 (9/19/13, I, Cringely): The best tech writers are able to present their own visions of the future. In this case, technology journalist Mark Stephens — known by his pen name, Robert X. Cringely — delivers his predictions about Apple’s predictions. […]
Great article and for me this is a vision I not only look forward but partake in. Apple is late to this vision, Android is already doing this. My nexus 4 can plug into a monitor (wired or wireless) and use a bluetooth keyboard and mouse flawlessly. When i go to a meeting and need to take notes I simply take a small light bluetooth keyboard and my phone. Prop up the phone with a little stand and away I go. At work during lunch (we have a horrible browser at work) I plug my phone into the monitor and get caught up on personal emails, browser and other consumable tasks. As other alluded the PadPhone and the Motorola WebTop are also implementations of Bobs idea.
I’m not going to edit video although photo editing for home use is close. For those tasks each house still needs a powerful computer, these days most likely a laptop. However, for the everyday task, the phone is the computer and Android does this phenomenally.
So yes, Apple is late to the game, but you are right, this is the future of computing. I have everything I ever need with me all the time and it fits in my pocket.
The only short coming for me right now is resolution, the Nexus 4 is 720p. I’m expecting the Nexus 5 will be 1080p which will be good enough for running a nice desktop on a monitor.
BAM it just hit me. I’ve been wondering for years about flash memory and the wall it apparently ran into. Hard disc drives have made steady and spectacular improvements. We can get a 4 Terrabyte drive at Costco for well under $200. Anybody priced a 4TB Flash drive lately? Of course not, they don’t exist. We can get 128GB flash now, yippee. You CAN actually purchase a 1TB SSD, for a $CLEVELAND. I’m just very suspicious of flash manufacturer’s inability to keep up with Moore’s law or even a fraction of Moore’s law. This is where the “Bam it hit me” comes in. The corporations buying up most of the world’s flash production are the same corporations with a vested interest in cloud computing. Let’s face it, if you could purchase 10TB of flash memory for a $Benjamin, what do you need the cloud for (except sharing occasional pictures, exchanging office docs, meh). If you are the puppeteer pulling the flash manufacturers strings, you can pretty well insure that massive cheap flash never hits the market.
Good thinking, sounds about right.
Well one thing for sure is that it’s probably more convenient for SSD manufacturers to keep on making low memory drives for those cloud computing stakeholders. Thus, they do not need investments in R&D or new costly equipments to make bigger SSD’s.
Maybe, but for ever.
Some upstart will see a way in and disrupt that little racket.
Eventually.
Surprising no one truly realise that those changes now limit Apple’s cost from a Dev perspective and foster Apps developers.
Want something else than crap icons? Pay! Wants anything really? Pay!
Apple only got minimal fixed cost to manage that, gain more access to devs, and potentially retain the, better if development and updates are less cumbersome for them.
Well they understood the real money makers are those dudes making apps and especially making their apps database the best.
The problem for us is that we’re often stuck in an environment that is a pain to get out from (high cost exit strategy) and it is very likely things will cost us even more (maybe not in direct price but because we’ll need some apps at least)
Apple already makes a device it can use as the mouse — an iPhone.
As usual, very interesting post, Mr. Cringely. Any informed speculation on road map/time table for a converged iOS/MacOS operating system?
QUESTION: is there any technical reason current or near-future iPhone chips couldn’t (ADEQUETELY!) support virtualization? That is, something like Bootcamp or VMware, and so iPhones could run MacOS, Windows, Android, Linux, etc.? (And software makers wouldn’t have to port their application to a converged iOS/MacOS operating system. (And end users wouldn’t have to buy new software licenses.))
Also, please: with iOS7, can users now copy PDF and other non-JPEG files to their devices from a flash drive via a USB/Lightning adapter? Thanx!
After so many comments looking forward to the converged iOS/Mac device, I decided to reread Bob’s column. What he is predicting is summed up here: “More likely, since it’s an iOS device, Apple will call this gizmo an iSomething.” That is an iOS device, with good enough iOS apps, and a docking station so that your phone can function like a desktop. This is similar to Microsoft’s plans for WindowsRT (Windows 8 without legacy support for x86 programs). If the iOS or WinRT apps aren’t good enough, they can always charge you for cloud processing. For now the only converged device available is full Windows 8, since supports legacy x86 programs and the new WinRT apps.
The converged device will be an iPad with a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse.
Docking has been available for many years, so is nothing special. Bob is saying that that is his vision of the future (using iOS apps only with docking for the desktop) but that also depends on getting apps and cloud services to the point where no one needs to run current “desktop” programs that require OSX or full Windows. Currently Windows 8 is converged in that sense since it runs legacy Windows x86 programs and the new “apps” that use Windows RT. Currently, Apple requires two devices to run both types of programs.
I’ve been expecting this device for years. The only issue (to me) is storage, because I don’t like/want to keep that much in the Cloud. But, with a fast enough link, I could have big data on my desktop in external storage, and only have the more globally necessary (i.e., I need this on the road) stuff in the phone or the Cloud. I mean, are we really all that far away from a 250GB or even 500GB phone? I think not…
[…] The Secret of iOS 7 (cringely.com) […]
My sons school already has the teachers air playing content from theirs and students iPads to Apple TV connected projectors in each class.
That around 100 Apple TV units in the whole school!!!
These kids will eventually be workers who will expect the same.
Here is something else I have been thinking about, the divergence in the direction of consumer device quality levels and cloud services through soda straws. We now have 36 megapixel, 41mp and rumored 46mp consumer cameras. 4K TV is just around the corner. Hollywood is experimenting with 60 frames per second. How is the cloud going to keep up with this level of data? Never mind the flimsy pipeline, the server load for dishing up 4000 lines of resolution x 1.5 geeks per household would be staggering. Current Red Epic cameras produce 5K, never mind what’s in the labs. Does anyone see a problem here?
With high capacity disks and drives that can be sold with content (like Blu-ray) or with local servers that store (DVR) content downloaded over night. Where data caps exist, the physical media will have to be used. But obviously the desire is to have high speed connections coupled with downloading for later viewing. Unfortunately, many people are satisfied with a “big screen” TV, and before that “color” TV, no matter how bad it looks. And the more gadgets you have kluged together to accomplish this the greater your bragging rights!
Ronc, I have a 36 megapixel camera that produces 40+ megabyte files every time I push the button. Resolution like this are what distinguishes DSLR cameras from cell phones and that trend is guaranteed to continue. I can easily shoot 4GB in a weekend. In just a couple of years you won’t be able to buy cell phone with less than a 16 megapixel camera, maybe even next year. That new Nokia won’t even allow you to send its 41MP pictures (you must plug it in to retrieve). Here is the divergence. The only compelling reason to even develop a 64-bit processor is to address massive memory. It makes no sense at all to create a high octane cell phone, ipad, or indeed anything, that is totally dependent on the web. The iphone 5 has what, a gig of ram and at most 64 gigs of memory? Am I the only one that sees how ridiculous? Its like having a 2GH processor to play Pacman. The divergence in local processing capability will drown anything and everything cloud. For easy math, let’s say that every cell phone will soon have a 20 megapixel camera. Again for easy math let’s say every picture is a highly compressed jpeg of 10MB. Lets say every week each user takes 100 pictures. That’s 52 gigs per year per person just in snapshots (never mind the cat videos) x 300 million in the US; 4 billion in China, etc. Imaging the Verizon overage charges. You cannot command that device manufacturers shall ease up on development. Local storage is destined to become a crisis. When an average file becomes gigabytes rather than megabytes, conventional hard disc drives will not be able to move that much data fast enough to keep people happy and your internet connection will seem like 28k dial-up all over again. The cloud concept, like 3D movies, comes around every so often and inevitably suffers the same fate each time. Get it?
Yep, and I remember when you left images off most of the time when you were web browsing because of the staggering amount of data you had to squeeze through a 14.4kbps modem. And getting so many pictures it overwhelmed my 500MB disk drive that cost me $550 at Egghead.
“The cloud concept, like 3D movies, comes around every so often and inevitably suffers the same fate each time. Get it?” I not only get it, but I fully agree with it. Ultimately each individual will make a personal decision about what to put in the cloud, what to save locally, what to not save at all, and how much data to create in the first place. It’s all going to depend upon cost/reliability/availability/security tradeoffs. For years I used local storage and backups exclusively, swearing to never depend upon a cloud service for anything. Then Microsoft’s email program for Windows 7 included a “sign in” option that saved my contacts in the cloud, and suddenly I could get to them and update them automatically no matter what I was using. No need to back them up! Then with the optional “sign in” to Windows 8, I suddenly found that my second install of Windows 8 already had all my favorite websites that I had been accumulating (and previously had to transfer from one install to another). No doubt if I choose to use a lot more cloud storage, I will reach the point where I’ll have to start paying extra for it but I’m a long way from that and can always start deleting stuff when I get there.
I think you are attaching Moore’s Law to file sizes. That just does not compute. PDF’s and other document sizes are not going up exponentially. Cameras with large megapixel sensors are created more for marketing reasons, not image quality reasons (excluding pro cameras). I shoot about 1000 sports pics a weekend with a 6 megapixel DSLR turned down to 4 megapixel resolution. Why? No one is going to print out an image larger than an 8×10, and if they really wanted to, they could use a fractal based image enlarger to eliminate pixelization on larger prints.
The only consumer need for larger storage based on increasing file sizes is due to video storage, but even that has its limits. A 1 terabyte drive is excessive for the average desktop user. The only reason personal storage needs are going to increase will be due to archiving data. That increase will be more linear, not exponential.
So a tablet for the average consumer needs is very feasible, especially if backed up to a desktop or the cloud.
There’s no problem. If you want to edit your feature film on your phone, that’s your business, just as you are permitted to dig your swimming pool with a teaspoon from your kitchen.
But Bob is right. News today that Apple is planning a 12″ ipad: http://bgr.com/2013/09/25/apple-12-inch-ipad-rumor/
What do you call a 12″ ipad with a Bluetooth mouse & keyboard? The end of Office.
And I thought the secret of iOS 7 was money laundering and tax dodging.
That would have been more interesting than a Bluetooth mouse. 🙂 I find it strange they ever supported a Bluetooth keyboard without the mouse. Perhaps a few users called up Apple to point out that oversight, so they fixed it…no secret agenda at all.
Interesting perspective, you forget one thing though ‘execution’, without Steve Jobs’ iron fist it will take a miracle to get this vision executed properly. iOS 7 was a big release, yes, but the execution was lacking in places, something that you don’t expect from apple. Siri is still unusable (maybe interesting as a novelty) and so is Apple maps.
Interesting thoughts. Having a 64 bit processor in the iPhone will definitely make running apps on Mac or iWhatever easier. I didn’t make the leap to having your cpu in your pocket just a form of docking station on your desktop though.
Shades of the Newton – the eMate in particular, but with a different tack… hope this one pans out.
“…definitely make running apps on Mac or iWhatever easier…” Why? How is it “easier”?
[…] un paso definitivo para convertir al iPhone en un puesto de trabajo convencional, algo que también comentaba Robert Cringely recientemente en su […]
[…] un paso definitivo para convertir al iPhone en un puesto de trabajo convencional, algo que también comentaba Robert Cringely recientemente en su […]
[…] traditional PC? Author and tech guru Robert X. Cringely wrote a fantastic post last week entitled “The Secret of iOS 7,” that points out how Apple’s latest mobile operating system could shake up the mobile and PC […]
Cool article but that guy who wrote it is just some apple fanboy and the article was one sided on apple. If everything went perfect for apple and there was no constant competitive market than this would be the outcome. He barely took into account that google just bought a biomedical company and that Microsoft just bought almost all of Nokia. Apple isn’t buying anything and they think they can just produce these things in house with their small R&D department in comparison to Google or Microsoft. Apples dying and they guy knows it he just wishes it wasn’t true.
[…] a 64-bit processor. So it’s got multipath TCP networking. Why does any of that matter? Cringley explains why it matters here. Go read that. It’s important. I’ll […]
Apple is definitely moving in the direction of disaggregating and commoditizing non-mobile terminals. AirPlay across the ecosystem is one of the strongest things in Apple’s armada for the future of computing and media. I think Bob’s right about the endgame but wrong about the timelines. It will take more than a year to get to the predicted state, probably more like 5 years.
The knock in the final paragraph about iPod, iPhone and iPad being only 3-5 year dominant is crazy though.
iPod lasted well over 6+ as the only major player and this market was only killed by the evolution of the product itself.
iPhone commands a majority of the $400+ (by the unsubsidized cost) market, going on 6 years.
iPad still has most of the tablet marketshare 3+ years on.
Low-cost (read: free) Android devices included, Apple’s share gets diluted significantly. Still, the two ends of the market are apples to oranges in terms of user behaviors and platform loyalty. Claiming that Apple “lost” any of these markets is downright insane when you compare balance sheets between them and *any other manufacturer*.
A very interesting read, Bob. Great piece.
Though i’m probably a bit biased as it echoes some of the ideas i wrote about 4 years ago:
https://www.sallonoroff.co.uk/blog/2009/08/shiny-new-apple-products/
I always thought that “iPod” was a fantastic, forward-looking bit of branding from Apple – a name which allowed the product to evolve way, way beyond music. Though I understood the reasoning, I was still kind of surprised when the name changed for the iPhone. Maybe in years to come the iPod music player will be retired and the name re-used for the little iOS device we carry our whole life around on.
I’m hopeful for Bob’s vision of convergence of mobile and desktop. We’re almost there.
A little off topic, but does anyone but me think that IOS is a step backward in UI usability? I have used every Apple OS since Mac 128 and never regretted upgrading – until now. Yes, there are lots of good new features. But the removal of buttons, icons, shadows and shading in favor of text links makes it harder and less intuitive to use! I’m nostalgic for iOS6!
[…] I, Cringely The Secret of iOS 7 […]
I’ve been touting the ‘desktop in your pocket is coming’ theory for about a year now. But it never occurred to me that Apple would get there first. Given Microsoft’s penchant for innovation lethargy, you just may be right!
While I think the computer in our pocket is great, it is still something worth having to have a larger computer whether tablet or laptop or desktop to do long periods of work on. The occasional brief email on the phone is fine, but I cannot imagine creating documents and doing large time periods of work on such a small device.
The idea is a dockable phone like some umpcs from the last decade (OQO http://web.archive.org/web/20110725135644/https://www.oqo.com/ )
[…] not here to write code, you’re here to ship products” by Joel Spolsky. 3. The Secret of iOS7 – futurology about the Apple’s next big bet, and how iOS7 would be supporting it. […]
[…] The Secret of iOS7 [thanks to Nils Davis for sharing this link!] “I expect Apple to build for road warriors a new class of devices that have the display, keyboard and trackpad of a notebook but without the CPU, memory or storage. Call it a MacBook Vacuum, because it’s a MacBook Air without the air. What I’m predicting, then, is an Apple resurgence. But let’s understand something here: this is yet another product class that Apple will dominate for awhile then eventually lose. It’s a 3-5 year play just like the iPod, iPhone, and iPad. Google and Amazon will be in hot pursuit, each more willing than Apple to pay to play.” […]
[…] my mobile phone. In the office it would be nice to have that bigger display and keyboard, but as I have written beforethese are becoming wireless peripherals that will shortly be activated whenever I am nearby. The […]
There is a month-to-month subscription plan that
allows you to purchase games for as much as 80% off the regular price.
The golden toad and the harlequin frog of Costa Rica are gone completely as a result of the
global warming changes we are experiencing. Sometimes bait substances
work despite a very great degree of lack of proven scientific information
on why this is.
Loved the article. I have been trying to sell this concept for years. In fact, I started a 3-part article trying to organize my thoughts on this back in January of 2012
http://thespinningmule.com/2012/01/fragmented-personal-computing/
Unfortunately I never finished the third article where I was going to lay out the direction I thought companies needed to head (a single device in your pocket that was capable of displaying to multiple form factors–tablets, computers, dual monitors, etc). I think Microsoft is well poised to make this transition as well (it may well be the saving grace of Windows 8).
Once again great article.
[…] Deliberate obsolescence can push us toward replacing a PC, but replacing it with what? The third trend means the next PC I buy for my kids won’t be a PC at all, but a phone. I wrote about this before in my column The Secret of iOS 7. […]
Con havin tanto contenido y artículos Contenido
¿alguna vez surge algún problemas
The Absent Game
In between me and my husband we have owned much more MP3 gamers over time than I can count, such as Sansas, iRivers, iPods (typical & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few many years I’ve settled down to one line of players.
nice articles
good articles
[…] I, Cringely The Secret of iOS 7 […]