Rodney, an artist/poet/landscaper who also happens to be my wife’s old boyfriend, got his mobile phone bill the other day and was shocked to see that Echo, his 16 year-old daughter, had the month before sent or received more than 14,000 SMS text messages from her mobile phone. Yes, Echo has unlimited texting, but among her friends this behavior isn’t unusual and it says a lot about how media habits — good and bad — are changing in our culture.
If a typical month has 30 days that’s 720 hours, a third of which we’ll guess Echo spends asleep, giving her 480 hours of texting time per month. Fourteen thousand texts (the number was actually higher, but we’ll round it down for simplicity) divided into 480 hours is about 29 texts per hour or about one every two minutes. Since texting is usually a binary activity (the texter sends a text for every text they receive) we can guess that Echo writes about 7,000 text messages per month, with writing probably taking twice as much time as reading. Half an hour at the mall with a stopwatch told me the average teenage SMS message takes about 20 seconds to type (if you can call it typing) suggesting that Echo is spending about a quarter of her waking time on texting.
According to both Neilsen and the Pew Internet Life Project, Echo is an outlier, a user of texting at prodigious levels beyond her peers. A Neilsen study from the second quarter of 2008, for example, says that mobile phone users age 13-17 send or receive an average of 1742 texts per month, which would only require 7.25 hours by my reckoning. So Echo is an outlier, but on the other hand her data is fresher and texting IS rising at a rapid pace.
So who cares? Advertisers care. Kids who are texting aren’t attending to TV ads while they are doing it, nor are they reading magazines or newspapers (what are those?). So advertising is coming quickly to SMS.
TV executives care. Remember those words “standard text messaging rates apply” at the end of every American Idol episode? Well for reality television, texting means revenue. Idol averages 30 million voters per week of which a quarter are using SMS that reportedly yields a nickel per vote to the TV producers. Seven and a half million messages per week and 12 weeks of voting yields another $4.5 million per season for Simon and the gang.
Educators care because texting competes with other activities like paying attention at school and doing homework. Keeping kids from texting in school is almost impossible.
To really understand the Echo phenomenon, though, you have to appreciate that she’s a very pretty girl living in a semi-rural area where kids like to complain that there isn’t anything to do. So they gossip. If teens twittered, which studies show they don’t, Echo would be a twitterer because her peers are interested in her life. And THAT’s what really makes her an outlier, because Echo is an opinion leader and a trend-setter and SMS — generally a one-to-one technology — isn’t well-suited for that. So the poor girl has to work really hard to keep all her friends informed, using an antiquated interpersonal communication technology as an ad hoc social network.
What’s most interesting to me about this phenomenon is the part about teens not twittering. All the studies show that’s true but don’t seem to look for causality. They miss the simple point that twittering is public behavior (one-way at that!) and texting is private and bi-directional. An adult or a teen celebrity might twitter but most regular kids see what they are communicating as too private to share with anyone other than the person for whom it is intended, much less any old creep who chooses to subscribe. And divas like Echo, who might happily embrace a more public channel, are trapped by the tools of their audience.
Girls age 13-17 are interested in relationships (who likes who) and boys age 13-17, who would normally be interested more in things, also happen to be generally obsessed with girls age 13-17, effectively dragging boys into the sway of SMS, too, sustaining an industry.
There’s clearly a new product opportunity in here, somewhere.
Andy Hertzfeld tells how Steve Jobs used to argue for a faster-booting Macintosh citing the man-years and lives it would save. But that’s nothing compared to the impact some twitter-like hybrid SMS product would have for a girl like Echo. It could change her life. Maybe even free up enough time for her to get into Duke.
And as the central node in an Idol-like SMS network, her popularity might even cover some of that Duke tuition, too.
I guess I’m a bit of a social outlier as well. I don’t really see why folks are so caught up with talking with others. All these cell phone conversations, twittering, etc. The best I can manage is to repost funny pictures of animals.
As a parent of a couple teenagers and a couple post-teenagers….
SMS Texting — Yes, 100’s of messages a month. Even though they have unlimited plans we’ve encouraged them to limit texting and be smart about it. Their biggest use of texting is to coordinate “what are we going to do tonight?” I wish I could program a button on my phone to send an automated text to my kids that says “Are you still alive? Please check in.”
Voice calls — Only as a last resort. It seems like a waste to give one’s kids a cell phone when they use them only for texting and an alarm clock. (Could this be a product idea?)
Twitter — No. Don’t care. They think it is interesting dad has a Twitter account.
Facebook — Still very big. They check it several times a day.
Email — still being used. They check it about once a day. When in college it is the prefer means to ask mom and dad for more money.
AIM — Now passe’, old fashion.
Xbox Live — The kids love talking to each other on their headset’s as much as playing the game. I have seen them get together a conference call on Xbox Live to decide where they were going to meet for dinner. (Perhaps another product/service idea?)
bbfn, cyl
John said, “AIM — Now passe’, old fashioned.”
I believe John; he’s a dad with experience and I’m not… but geez, I don’t get it. SMS is just instant-messaging, except you pay a nickel for every back-and-forth! Am I wrong about that, fundamentally?
Again, I’m not a dad so I am missing a big chunk of experience here… is it really impossible to explain the non-difference between IM and SMS to a kid, and ask her/him/it to use IM instead, as it’s free?
(oh wait – as I think about it before hitting ‘submit’… maybe the problem is kids’ cheapo phones don’t have internet; they *only* have SMS? maybe I begin to see the problem.)
Simple. To use AIM you need a PC. To use SMS you need a cell phone. One you can carry in your pocket or purse, the other you can’t. The phone companies are smart enough to know to charge for each message, which by the way (BTW) are 20 cents (US) each unless you have the unlimited option.
…hence the interest in netbooks. could it be the next instant messaging platform, among other things?
Bob last column could be very timely. There is a groundswell of activity in this area.
If one has an internet-enabled phone, you don’t need a PC. I use “Fring” on my iPhone – allows one to chat on Skype, Google chat, MSN, Yahoo, AIM, and good old ICQ. I recall a similar program on my old blackberry, though the name escapes me.
I guess the difference is that teens don’t have these higher-end phones that can manage IP traffic.
SMS is only the preferred way to gossip until you have a job involving sitting in front of a computer, then IM becomes a lot more relevant (Speaking as a manager of 19-23 year-old programmers) because if you are seen using a cellphone you are definitely NOT working. It all has to do with what’s most convenient and while you’re in highschool, walking between classes, and hanging out wherever, you use SMS. Once you get a dorm room and a cubicle, IM, Twitter and Facebook take precedent.
So based on your observations, John, teens prefer to have conversations with a group via xbox live but not one-on-one phone conversations yet they prefer to text via one-on-one SMS rather than to a group via twitter (with or without private settings) even if the purpose of the texting is to determine plans for a group.
Those results seem contradictory to me but then, my parents didn’t understand me when I was a teenager either. 🙂
It’s not contradictory. Bob mentioned the privacy issue. On the xbox conference call, they get to choose who is part of the “in group”. On twitter, parents or other undesirables could be following the conversation.
Interesting article as ever Bob, and as a parent a slightly disturbing one (if only because kids should be at home playing video games instead of wasting their time with this new fangled technology).
Anyway, I digress – one thing that probably skews the figures is the fact that one text can be sent to your entire address book, which will count as multiple texts. So if you have an address book of 100 friends (not impossible for the average alpha teen) then you can strike 100 texts with a single hit.
Not only would this explain the ridiculous ammount of time apparently spent texting, but it also serves as a personal SMS tweet replicating the function of twitter, but only for a limited audience.
You can set your twitter account to be private and only visible to those you approve. Another pointless column by Bob. Is it just me, or is Cringely less interesting and perceptive than he used to be?
In response to P. I think Bob’s posts are a lot better post PBS. Read the article again and come up with the next big thing.
Yes P, but you look at where the critical mass is.
Teens took to texting before there was Twitter.
Teens who text don’t have to worry about security. For instance, the parent does a password-reset on the Twitter account to snake it from email. Know where your phone is? Then you’re safe.
If teens want to broadcast to more friends, they use Facebook.
Yes, but all messages are visible to all the people who have subscribed, even if the account is private. That is the problem with Twitter.
If she sends almost the same message to Tina as she sent to Gina, the difference may be totally invisible to the grown ups, but huge!!!! The one-one nature makes the message feel more personal, very important to teenagers and peers. There is no sincere way to say BFF to a group.
The cost does not matter. Are they paying the bill? It is $20 more for the unlimited plan, so the per message cost seems free. Especially if Mom and Dad pick up the tab.
Before anyone attempts to counter Doug with “What about Direct Messages?”…
Why bother going all that route for a direct message? Especially one with a web-based and possibly an email-archive based audit system?
Twitter is great for adults who are SOMETIMES mobile and SOMETIMES behind a desk and SOMETIMES on IM. It’s a network that spills across to all the places we COULD be, without us having to chase.
Teens have their cellphones. Always.
Actually, I’ll come up with an even easier reason why kids will use SMS and not twitter:
SMS is everywhere.
I have an el-cheapo pay-as-you-go Verizon phone, which I picked up for $99. It works fine for what I use it for, which is very little. But I can send SMS messages.
I’m planning on replacing it with an iPhone 3G S. This $199 wonder can do just about anything–including SMS. I could also get a Nokia N97 for more than $199 and it will (arguably) do even more than the iPhone! Including SMS!
Twitter and Facebook require either an “expensive” phone (which teens may not be able to talk Mom & Dad into) or a computer (which is significantly less portable). But I can send an SMS message to pretty much everybody, whether they’re using a SideKick, iPhone, Palm Pre, Motorola RAZR, or an el-cheapo Verizon phone.
There’s also the obvious: SMS runs on the phone network, which means I can leave my phone in standby mode and save battery life. Twitter requires I be connected to the Internet, which kills my battery life. All this communication stuff is wonderful, but a dead battery means I’m out of touch.
It’s just you
P:
“Is it just me, or is Cringely less interesting and perceptive than he used to be?”
Cancel your subscription and demand a refund.
““Is it just me, or is Cringely less interesting and perceptive than he used to be?””
“Cancel your subscription and demand a refund.”
Being right doesn’t entitle you to speak your mind.
These simple numbers don’t tell the whole story. If you send the same message to five people, the cell phone company charges you for five messages. So if there is any significant gossiping going on with multiple friends, her rate may be much less than one every two waking minutes.
Texting is a private+social+physical+intimate event between usually 2 people. Voice calls are too public – gossips might be overheard. While texting is an activity that engages in virtually all senses of a person – THAT is why it is so addictive. Just as cigarette smoking is not all about nicotine or drinking coffee only about caffeine.
Twitter by default puts everything on the public timeline and is not as private or reliable and more difficult to track and search (I love to see what a 100s replies txt msg conversation looks like on the iPhone’s Text display). Grown-ups use Twitter – ergo why teens do not – because grown-up has much bigger ego and greater vanity. Other than vanity, Twitter is actually a underused near-real-time data feed system and free listserver and more. Real work can be done on it and that’s not fun for teens.
FWIW – My data points.
As the parent of 19 yr old twin girls who just finished freshman year in collage. Stats: Got macs & phones as freshman in high school (5 yrs ago) Immediately went to AIM and used heavily for about 2 years. AIM largely replaced by Facebook & SMS in jr. year of HS. They have each consistently used ~3K SMS/month (each) for the last 3 years (I know this from the phone bills). I don’t have volume data on FB or AIM because I don’t snoop but I ask a couple times a year and they say they almost never use AIM much. Its SMS during the day when mobile on campus and FB at “home” when on the mac. Oh, and email? yeah well that’s now a “formal” channel, meaning to interact with parents or profs or other non-peers.
Whats interesting is my 25-30 yo kids and their peers don’t text that much (except the where are you? what are we doing 2night? type messages) but use the heck out of FB (my 30 yo daughter has her FB on an RSS feed to her desktop @ work) and do some limited twittering.
Google Wave is the solution you are looking for. Specifically Google Wave mobile which doesn’t exist yet.
I am sure it will exist…soon enough.
now the question remains how to get the kiddies hooked?
This was the first thing I thought of when he talked about the next big targeted communication means.
By the way, Google Voice already lets you send sms messages.
Wow! 14,000 texts a month. I doubt I have sent 14,000 texts in the 10 years that I have owned a mobile phone. I guess this shows the massive spread of the market now. I’m only 26 so I’m not that far away from the teen demographic relative to the majority of the population either.
Maybe something we don’t consider when thinking about future media is that there won’t be a one size fits all solution like TV was for our parents and the radio was for our grandparents.
My daughter DID just get into Duke, and she only sends 50 to 100 texts per month. And zero tweets.
Please tell me the name “Echo” is a pseudonym…
MXiT (which I have nothing to do with and am comprehensively culturally alienated from!) solves this problem for echo’s target market. And has, hence, been hugely successful in South Africa and one or two other places I believe. Although at some levels MXiT is really just IM for mobile.
Bob,
My 14 year old son and his 13 year old girlfriend explain it thus:
SMS is for one-on-one private communications, Facebook (iPhone edition) is for broadcast to your tribe, all of whom are pre-vetted via the friend process.
Twitter is for old guys, most of whom want to influence you in some way, mostly so they gain something. Avoid…
Email is something the teacher makes you use, and when you check it there is often mail from gross people that you don’t know about making certain parts of someone’s body bigger. Avoid at all costs…
Overall, the 8th grade appears completely ok with the tools currently at their disposal.
-Bubba
Echo is NOT a pseudonym. And her middle name is Jasmine.
My theory: Echo’s name explains her popularity. She echos what everyone else is doing, having no personal interests of her own. Like any typical “leader” she runs to the front of the pack and appears to be leading. This also explains the 14,000 messages/month, requiring no creative thinking.
Ronc, casting aspersions about someone you do not know, except for one fact, says more about you than a teen caught up in the electronic world we have bestowed upon her.
BTW, Ronc, Echo, now sixteen, will be a junior in college when she is eighteen. Now, I don’t know about you but when I was eighteen, I had just graduated from high school.
Great analysis, Mark – I had made many of the same calculations and gave Echo hell for spending much of her life working on getting carpal tunnel syndrone. I gave her a job this summer working in my office and she checks her BB at the door.
You’re right Jerry, it makes no sense to critisize someone based on their name. I guess I was commenting on what I’ve observed about the use of the word “leadership” in some circles.
Ronc, thank you for responding.
I must confess to being a protective/proud grandfather.
Have a good week.
This is an entertaining discussion. Thanks everyone.
I won’t go so far as to call my kids lazy. They do like an economy of effort. Texting on a cell phone is simpler and more mobile than messaging on a PC.
More than once we’ve found ourselves exchanging several messages with our kids. The obvious question is — why don’t we just call and talk directly to each other?
My kids prefer to text…
…from school…”I forgot my lunch, can you leave it at the office.” Teachers don’t like students conducting phone calls, they’ll tolerate an occasional “I forgot my lunch (or homework), may I text my mom.”
…from a movie or concert…Texting is silent. You don’t bother others and you don’t have to contend with background noise.
…when you don’t need a real time 2 way discussion and just want to leave a status message…”I’m at the football game.” Or, “I’m at xyz’s house.”
Kids prefer voice conversations…
…”I’ve been pulled over by a policeman and he wants to talk to you.” Or another parents favorite “I wrecked the car.”
As a parent I don’t mind any of this. In a way it is actually a very good thing. When I was my kids age we had to look for pay phones to check in with my parents. At college long distance phone calls were expensive and I generally only talked to my parents a few times a semester. Today I have 24×7 access to my kids. It is easy for them to check in. They forget to check in sometimes, but it is usually not a problem. At college we hear from our kids almost daily, by email, text, or cell phone call. As our kids are discovering the (good) fun of college life, they share it with us. As they start thinking about their degrees and careers, they call to discuss their thoughts. It is a lot better today, I think. If I have to pay an extra $10 a month for texting, it is money well spent.
Personally I don’t like using the cell phone when I am driving, as that makes it much harder to use my Nintendo DS…
Seriously, I was not surprised by the statistics that Bob quoted regarding Echo’s texting levels; she may not be as big an outlier as you think. Often when my wife or I serve as carpool for a social event for one of our teenage daughters, it is not uncommon for the ride in the van to be completely silent…all of the passengers are texting non-stop, EVEN WITH OTHER PASSENGERS IN THE VAN. Crazy.
> all of the passengers are texting non-stop, EVEN WITH OTHER PASSENGERS IN THE VAN
They’re probably talking about you. 🙂
It is the end of civilization. Time wasted on empty babbling, fallowing the mind. It really was different 40 years ago. Is it any wonder that the Right WingNuts can convince such morons of anything that twinges their paranoia points?
And, I recall an article somewhere (here?) that texting costs the telecos $0 since they are carried on a sub-band. Thus extorting subscribers into “unlimited” texting plans. Cute.
@ Robert Young: What’s the point of gratuitously injecting your political slant into a discussion like this?
My brilliant niece, who just graduated cum laude from Vanderbilt, reports that the mindless moonbat hordes are the real discussion-stoppers on campus. I find that to be equally true elsewhere, too. Let’s just agree texting probably doesn’t cultivate any deep thinking in our youngsters and leave it at that, OK?
As Ben Franklin famously said, regarding the value of Silence :
“Speak not but what may benefit others or yourself; avoid trifling conversation.”
That’s a profound philosophical statement we could all benefit from.
Thanks, Bob, for once again providing a starting point for an interesting and useful conversation.
Because empty headed kids turn into empty headed voters. In case it is not obvious.
That is just what our grandparents were thinking of my generation when I was teen. We were either chasing ball or listening to rock ‘n roll (’70s you know REAL ROCK ‘N ROLL). Each time is different. But at least I will always remember and listen to good music of that time. Still into it – just can’t get into music that is today. Boy aren’t Zepellins and Stones and so many of them from the ’70s the only real thing or not ? Still can’t achieve my dream to buy a farm and turn the volume on the stereo all the way up. It was always my mom or my neighbors who thought it was always way too loud. So hopefully one day I’ll buy a farm with no one miles away and crank that volume up all the way up.
I think Mark is under-estimating the need for confidentiality in the one-on-one nature of SMS.
My Indian friends have a powerful bond based on their Indian-ness. They all are on Orkut, which has features of Twitter, Facebook and IM built in. I’m sure someone is working on an Android port of Orkut to show us the way forward.
The young girl in the story should use twitter. Tell her to make an account and set it to private. Get her five best friends (or more of course) to make private accounts also and have everyone follow everyone else. What do you have now? A chat room that you can view on the web, in a twitter phone app on a smartphone or even, that’s right, sms. If your phone has threaded SMS then it even LOOKS like a chat conversation. If she keeps it to a circle of friends who all follow each other there is no need for that character-eating @stupidusername junk.
Yes Bob, you are right on although not the first who saw this opportunity. 🙂
http://bizdev.blog.extendance.com/2009/06/09/on-twitter-and-sms/
Cheers
ralf
Echo doesn’t need a new messaging technology, she just needs a phone that can send the same SMS to a list of recipients, like mine. That could cut her texting time down by a decent multiple.
In fact I’m wondering whether she already has this and Bob and her dad just don’t realze it.
Simon
I don’t have a clue what “SMS” means and why should I do the work of looking it up, when you could just as easily provide that inforrnation at the start, since I think you might already know.
Cancel your subscription and demand a refund, Freeble.
Bob – there have been plenty of “twitter-like hybrid SMS” started by none have thrived due to the costs. While many people have unlimited text plans for their phones, services that receive and send those messages to groups have to pay.
Many of these service thought they could make their revenue through advertising, usually a 20 character blurb that would piggy-back on messages. But ad buyers never bought because they’d being paying a CPM of $20-$30 for a very short ad. Compare that to the 250 character advertisement on Facebook for a CPM of $8.
My company hit this wall last year so we now concentrate on high stakes groups that are willing to pay for messages.
Interesting Bob, but given your past life as a foriegn journalist, why no mention of the biggest, and perhaps the most important, twitter story of the moment.
Very interesting read, I have a 18 year old stepson and a 2 year old daughter.
My stepson lives on his phone, all txt messaging.
Why no internet, coz it costs a extra $30 a month to get a data package Paul .. Duhhh
My mum was visiting from the UK and took his phone off him so she could talk to him with no interruptions..lol
I wonder if SMS is going to kill the art of conversation completely?
NO texting is great.. i hate voice to voice, i stutter, and stammer, and detest it, plus im too shy .. in a dinner convo, i say have no cells even on. or on silent.. I work with many artists, and I need to be able to get a hold of them by mass sms consistantly calling all 450 artists is time consuming, not to mention pointless, give me my sms, and as for teens?? They best not have a cell phone till they have a job and can pay for it.. sorry. It worked for me and will work for my two boys. 🙂
Most phones allow you send SMS to multiple people, or even you’re whole address book at once. The Cell companies consider each one a single message.
So if you send a single SMS to 20 people.. 20 messages. That’s how kids rack up big SMS counts.. sending lots of messages to all or most of their address books.
So SMS to them is one to many, not one to one.
Facebook or twittter would be much more efficient. (but with unlimited text, who cares)
true but this has no “group” element to it as they only recieve it as distribution – they don’t know who else got it and cannot answer it.
But with Sendm (downloadable from OVI on Nokia devices or at contactus@sendm.biz) you can do that from most devices today.
As a European, what you describe is interesting in the sense that this has been the case for at least 5 years… I assumed this was because there were no Twitter/Facebook/and so on. at the time.
With smartphones (in Europe at least), they seem to switch out of text in favor of insite mail messaging (e.g. mail in facebook-)
switching is occuring far more slowly that you think with more than 80% of europeans still not using data….
Seems like the “product” needed here is software, not hardware. If a better mobile OS, maybe an Android app, could make semi-private twitter SMSing easy and fast, there may be no need for new hardware.
Wouldn’t surprise me if some Googleheads are way ahead of us on this already.
it exists to receive an app. send an email to contactus@sendm.biz….
Gentlemen, gentlemen, please: I am radio ham since I was 15 years old. We use the radio to talk about our experiments with electronics… but many other people used the radio to talk about other subjects. We talked, from “… I have a Collins Radio Rcvr. xxxx…” to “… copy you QSA 5/QRK 4 … and there is some QSB … that guy with his Single Side Band is probably using more than 1 kW….” small talk, and some times thinge became interesting, I mean technically … and it was all over the radio amateur bands, local and international. I have this antenna and I am using this adapter to load balancing the power … People talk. So we do here. This is the way we pay Bob for his gossip service. Bob, would you please address on issues like why are there so many frameworks in the Java market today ? Which is the best/worst ? And I agree: the faster the computer boots, as The Master says, the better. My regards to you all.
Twitter == SMS
My wife and I have iPhones, and have gradually adopted texting as our preferred means of communication during the day as it eliminates the frequent voice message misunderstandings caused by distraction and middle aged hearing, not to mention ambient NYC noise. Combined with mature, responsible use and adult restraint, we are proud models of acceptable texting. Alas, our impeccable personal examples are for naught, as our 5 year old daughter texts, texts, TEXTS!!! But I must say she is experiencing the thrill of early literacy, and arguably developing it. Her correspondents are relatives and classmates, and sometimes the President of the United States and Cinderella. I consider myself a very conservative and stodgy curmudgeon on the subject of education who would have all children reciting Cicero from memory by the second grade, but I think there is real social and developmental value to texting… en moderato!
Technology exists to provide a service to humanity. It needs to be profitable in order to be sustained. Technology and a good business plan go hand in hand. Those of us in technology often forget the money aspect of the equation. Like that old saying “no bucks, no Buck Rogers.”
So what have we learned here? Twitter is an interesting technology, but it is not popular with Teens — the biggest messaging group. Messaging is an important and very popular technology. If you were to invest money or more technology development in something, would it be Twitter, or something to do with SMS?
Facebook: very popular with the kids. AIM: is losing interest. Facebook allows kids to control who can communicate with them, AIM and email do not. The kids prefer not to get the junk. Is there a lesson here? For those truly interested in technology and where it is going, this is important stuff. I think this discussion has been very productive and not a sign of humanity’s collapse.
Do teens text too much? Probably yes. In every generation teenagers have managed to find ways to waste lots of time. Text’ing happens to be something families can do together too. When you have kids, perhaps one of the most important things to a parent is to maintain communication with them as they become young adults. Cell phones, texting, and YES, email help a lot. So I count my blessings.
Cell phones suck.
krp
“Girls 13 to 17 are interested in boys 13 to 17”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! Clearly you don’t have any teenage girls (13 to 17) in your life. Sadly, in my experience, girls 13 to 17 are a lot more interested in boys 18 to 25 than 13 to 17…. And boys 13 to 17 are interest in girls 13 to, whatever…. Just be glad little Echo is so busy texting she has little time for anything else.
Hi,
Well thanks for a great article, we at Sendm have been saying this for a while now and have developped a many-to-many SMS application giving the existing system Email – like capabilities (you can add/remove recipients and you can “reply-all” the application is downloadable for free (you can email us at contact@sendm.biz). We have launched the service with a number of operators around the world and are coming out with a new system that is not operator centric.
Anyone is welcome to contact us! We cover most of the world and a wide array of devices… many more to come
What strikes me about this, after watching my nieces and nephews text for hours while doing everything else, is nothing has changed in 20 years, if ever.
Texting is text, kiddies. Its just done on a wireless device which happens to have other functions. Ain’t technology grand?
20 years ago, we had netnews on our computers which came over the uucp network on the internet. We were rocket scientists. I’m sure some you the little kids mindlessly texting are pretty spacey too. But I digress….
Text in netnews (where 🙂 and 😉 and all manner of ascii symbols were born) then, text on SMS in cellphone devices now.
What is different? Back then, we spent maybe an hour or two a day reading and replying to netnews. And were considered mindless geeks for doing so. But then we went outside and did stuff, went to work, drove our cars without putting everyone else around us in danger.
You get the drift. Nothing changes except the technology… and the kiddies will get over the texting disease when they actually have to pay to put food in their mouths. Heh.
One more reason to text message.
We are planning a second honeymoon cruise, leaving the kids at home. (Yeah!) The cost to use our cell phones on the ship come to about $3.50 a minute. (All US $) On the islands using our cell phones will cost us about $1.50 to $2.50 a minute. Using a land line service (like USAdirect) will run almost $7 for the connection fee and first minute, $1.75 to 2.30 a minute thereafter. In the US Virgin Islands we’re looking at a $1.25 connection fee, $1.15 a minute.
We can text at $0.20 per message.
For the next cruise, we’ll have a some form of Internet phone.
The “twitter-like hybrid SMS product” you speak of already exists. It’s called MXit (www.mxit.co.za) and is what the teenagers use in South Africa and a number of other countries (over 120 according to Wikipedia). The reason for it’s popularity is because we don’t have unlimited texting plans in South Africa so it’s more affordable to use data services (GPRS/3G) to send messages than the SMS service. MXit supports both one-to-one conversations as well as group conversations hence covering both Twitter and SMS functionality.
Also keep in mind that websites such as Redbox, Facebook, myspace, banking sites, credit card sites, “joke of the day” sites, sport scores, etc. all send you text messages when they want to send you free promo codes, updates on who wrote on your wall, and who sends you a message, etc. I am an anti-social guy with few friends but still use about 300 texts a month (only about 20 each month are actual human to human interaction)
Bob,
What you didn’t factor in is although Echo may have sent 14,000 text messages at no additional cost to her father, the phone company charges not only for sending messages, but RECEIVING them.
Just think of how much revenue Echo has generated for the phone companies in the hands of Echo’s friends who may not have unlimited plans.
The tariffs for SMS messaging are just outrageous.
[…] Teens Don’t Twitter […]
[…] “Hi, I’m Kenny, I’m 14 years old, and I love playing those damn video games.”… […]
I think Echo is a hot name…Jerry…She must be a hot girl…btw I stalk her!!!!!
I love you Uncle Jerry!
look here jerry,
you are the antithesis of cool!! there is no way you can sit here and pick on cyber children criticizing your so-called grand daughter… for all we know you are some creepy old man pretending to be echo’s grandfather… I am actually her grandfather and take great offense to you posing as her fake grandfather… so back off old man!!!
Elliott “the-real-grandfather” Matticks
Elliott, I did not think you were old enough to drink; however, drink (or some other
type of intoxicant) is the only way you thought up this posting.
BTW – enjoy visiting with you last week at Tybee Island.
Elliott, Echo is spelled with a capital “E” like all names.
Check that out when you return to Furman this fall.
I might add, Elliot that you left out the comma when you wrote , “look here Jerry”.
Should read, “look here, Jerry”
[…] https://www.cringely.com/2009/06/teens-dont-twitter/ […]
[…] Teens Don’t Twitter […]
http://w01.ourworld.com/v11/tracking?source=ref_link&user_id=4954400
[…] Teens Don’t Twitter […]
[…] https://www.cringely.com/2009/06/teens-dont-twitter/ […]
[…] I, Cringely » Blog Archive » Teens Don’t Twitter – Cringely on … […]
I love to use Twitter whenever i want to know the latest buzz about my friends. I also use Twitter to know the latest buzz from famous persons –
I came to this webpage by looking on Yahoo. I have found it quite informative. Thanks for sharing. I will have to come back here again!
a lot more jailbreak, perhaps i need a new number of. purchase. i am going to enter their search words, jailbreak if so procure my iphone together with chums once without doing hand redownloading the parties?
Hi, Natural Penis Enlargement – GetBiggie has a great guide on how to increase your penis size by 1-4 inches using natural safe techniques.
Hi, Natural Penis Enlargement – GetBiggie has a great guide on how to increase your penis size by 1-4 inches using natural safe techniques.
I found your entry interesting do I’ve added the track to it on our blog
What’s most interesting to me about this phenomenon is the part about teens not twittering. All the studies show that’s true but don’t seem to look for causality. They miss the simple point that twittering is public behavior (one-way at that!) and texting is private and bi-directional. An adult or a teen celebrity might twitter but most regular kids see what they are communicating as too private to share with anyone other than the person for whom it is intended, much less any old creep who chooses to subscribe. And divas like Echo, who might happily embrace a more public channel, are trapped by the tools of their audience.
Girls age 13-17 are interested in relationships (who likes who) and boys age 13-17, who would normally be interested more in things, also happen to be generally obsessed with girls age 13-17, effectively dragging boys into the sway of SMS, too, sustaining an industry.
cheap VPS
There’s clearly a new product opportunity in here, somewhere.
Andy Hertzfeld tells how Steve Jobs used to argue for a faster-booting Macintosh citing the man-years and lives it would save. But that’s nothing compared to the impact some twitter-like hybrid SMS product would have for a girl like Echo. It could change her life. Maybe even free up enough time for her to get into Duke.
Good comments. SMS texting is becomming the way for everybody to communicate from 5 to 90 years old. 20 years ago one would never have imagined this form of technology. To be able to set reminders is another level for everyone
I was’nt sure I would like this site since it was about I, Cringely » Blog Archive » Teens Don’t Twitter – Cringely on technology but I was wrong and thought it was cool and alot like http://wholesalewaterproducts.com . Thanks and I’ll be back as you update.
Of course, what a great site and informative posts, I will add backlink – bookmark this site? Regards, Reader.
Wow, fantastic information thanks for posting !
Well, I have not yet read this post, but it seems very intersting.I would love to read more blogs from you in future. Keep up the amazing work.
Hi, the place did you get this information are you able to please assist this with some proof or you could say some good reference as I and others will actually appreciate. This information is really good and I’ll say will always be helpful if we attempt it risk free. So when you can again it up. That may actually help us all. And this would possibly bring some good repute to you.
Best wishes for tell incredibly beneficial informations. Your online is great.I am impressed by the facts that you have on this weblog. It shows how very well you realize this topic. Bookmarked this excellent page, will come again for a lot more. You, my buddy, amazing! I discovered just the facts I by now searched in all places and just wasn’t able to discover. What a perfect web site. Similar to this webpage your web site is 1 of my new most popular.I such as this knowledge shown and it has offered me some type of creativity to have success for some reason, so maintain up the beneficial function!
Hey, great site, love reading what you have to read, will pop back later to write something a tad more constructive then this but have bookmarked your site so will try not to forget! lol
a lot more jailbreak, perhaps i need a new number of. purchase. i am going to enter their search words, jailbreak if so procure my iphone together with chums once without doing hand redownloading the parties?
interesting post
Between me and my husband we’ve owned more MP3 players over the years than I can count, including Sansas, iRivers, iPods (classic & touch), the Ibiza Rhapsody, etc. But, the last few years I’ve settled down to one line of players. Why? Because I was happy to discover how well-designed and fun to use the underappreciated (and widely mocked) Zunes are. oyunlar1
thanks great =)
Not a terrible web site at all. I found this after doing some searches on Bing and it has really helped me to understand things much clearer – thank you.
Really creative blog here! Did you think of all of this content yourself or did you have some help? be honest.. lol
The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.
good (article|information) thanks
Couldent have put it any better my self, some points in this article is very accurate.
I reallyprefer this, it has a lot of tips.
I truly like your site
Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos,
Hi nice POst Addominali
Hey your situation looks a immature bit curious in Mozilla on my state machine Ubuntu .
Hey your position looks a less bit singular in Mozilla on my duty computer Ubuntu .
thank you likeGlad i recently uncovered this website, Another good site is Dbol will make sure to book mark it so i can stop by frequently.
Teens don’t email either. If you want to reach them you HAVE to text them!
Sorry for the huge review, but I’m really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it’s the right choice for you.
yes great Great Post. Really it will help lot of people. ya
Good report. Thanks for posting such an in deepness impression. I’ve handled one in the market, but your impart covered alot of ground that i couldn’t together with such a minute amount of time. based on my in-store feel and your recap i think i’ll be
Chinese students send SMS, even email is not used. Furthermore, they do not use twitter, since the great firewall blocks them from doing so.
Very interesting post. I am in the business of helping companies to advertise using text message marketing. SMS marketing has been around for few years now and the trend is catching up with the older generation as well. I see companies like Cirque du Soleil using SMS marketing to attract new customers, and their targeted audience is well passed their teenage years.
Hi there, I would love to thank you for taking the time to make such a wonderful article
One other issue is when you are in a problem where you don’t have a co-signer then you may actually want to try to wear out all of your financial aid options. You will discover many funds and other scholarships and grants that will offer you money to help you with college expenses. Thanks alot : ) for the post.
Nintendo 3DS for free…
[…]I, Cringely » Blog Archive » Teens Don’t Twitter – Cringely on technology[…]…
I’ll be back as you update.
You made some first rate points there. I seemed on the internet for the issue and located most individuals will associate with together with your website.
upload videos, blogs, polls, albums, meet people, social network, sube videos, conoce gente, red social…
[…]I, Cringely » Blog Archive Teens Don't Twitter – I, Cringely – Cringely on technology[…]…